Eanxbr
Registered
As a side note... any diver can call the dive at any time, no questions asked... or has that changed recently?
Question Near incident. What should I have done?
- Thread starter OctopusLover
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Wow. Oh wow. I had resolved to read through the whole thread before replying but this pisses me off.
If I lose track of a student when instructing, they darn well better be getting themselves to the surface after looking for a minute. There is no "it's different with instructor-student" situations rule and I sure as h**l don't want some never-dove-in-cold-murky-water instructor telling students differently. In his situation, I can see why he thought it might be ok. Vis is good, I'll see you as soon as we're out, right? Dangerous jerk.
I'll reply later with my compendium of this incompetents' errors.
That rule still applies today.
Burning through air on every dive and still refusing a larger cylinder... because of some weird idea that you can't learn buoyancy control with a 15 liter cylinder?
Were those cylinders steel or aluminum?
OP
OctopusLover
Registered
The Chairman
Chairman of the Board
Thanks. This is still my take-a-way as well. Could you have done better? Sure. You're not there yet, but I am confident that you will be. Keep kicking. Keep learning.
KenE
Contributor
I will re-iterate what has been said, but in a slightly different manner. You have learned a lot, but also accomplished a lot during this situation. **** happens, it doesn't matter how or why, it just does, in this case it did and you responded. You developed a plan and was ready to execute it. Was it the best plan, maybe or maybe not, but it would have kept the group alive to dive another day. The anchor line is better than open water, but open water is better than drowning. The important issue is you created a plan and did not panic. That in itself is an accomplishment, I have seen many panic and respond without a valid plan.
Diving in the Red sea, one year ago. I was on a dive with 7 others, the dive master, leader from the boat was my dive buddy. we were on a wreck dive, team leader entered the boat, I followed behind. torches on, all going well as we came accross some holes in a bulkhead of some sort separating another side of the boat, the holes were rot in the metal and had pieces projecting into the holes, leader made in through a hole, I admit i was slower navigating through the hole, worried about the sharp metal pieces. I guess all my consentration was looking at what I was doing, got throught the hole and buddy is gone !!. looking around I notice the person behind me has one of his/her hoses tangeled on one of the pieces of metal, is not aware of it and struggling. I turn back, release her/his hose and let her/him go in front of me. I am still looking for my dive buddy, two more divers come threw a different hole in front of me. To me it looked like these two divers knew where they were going, Dive buddy was gone, a minute or so has passed, Im not waiting inside this ship hoping someone comes back for me, I decide to follow these two out and then, figure out where I am, look for my group or suface. so as we left the boat, my dive buddy spotted me and I rejoined the group with the dive ending. On the boat I got nothing but ****, was the cause of a backup, that I caused all the silt to be desturbed, that it was not my responsilbilty to help that person, that I should have gone and got someone to go back and help..{ that one blows me away, considering I am a rescue diver} was asked to apologize to all the divers for cutting the dives short.. Not really sure how I feel about it all, my only beef is my dive buddy, who knew I didnt know the way, not even looking back to see if I was following him out the boat. Havent dived with this group again
OK, now I've read the whole thread. I will assign blame, primarily to the guide/instructor. But where to start?
I'm going to assume PADI (playing the odds and thinking most agencies offering AOW are likely similar).
1. You can mix students with non-students in an instructional dive per standards, but they do count against ratios. So if it's just one instructor, there shouldn't be more than 8 total customers (students and guided divers) in the group. Sounds like that's violation number 1. (Also, IMHO, there are limited times when this should happen. E.g., if you have somebody that just wants to refresh skills a bit, or wants to watch their friend or relative learn, or it's a person thinking of becoming a DM or somesuch. Putting folks who are in a class with folks expecting a guided tour is a disservice to the guided divers at best.)
2. If this dive was deeper than 18 m and you had not already done the deep dive of AOW, then there's a standards violation.
3. If this dive was deeper than 18 m the instructor is required to directly supervise the student divers throughout. Any separation is the instructors' fault.
4. If penetration was involved, the instructor is required to directly supervise the student throughout. Again, any separation is the instructors' fault.
5. Wreck penetration is not allowed for students doing dive 1 of the wreck course or a wreck dive as part of AOW. And while I could sort of see doing an easy "swim through" penetration (e.g., the bow deckhouse area on El Aguila in Roatan), that wasn't what this guy was doing: You couldn't see the group from the entry site.
6. We're so far out of line already that I hesitate to mention this, but what the heck. If you ARE doing a wreck penetration as part of a wreck course, your student : instructor ratio is 2:1. Even if this was a subsequent dive and otherwise legitimate from a training perspective, the fact that he took students plus the tourists into the wreck is yet another violation.
I'm not going to fault you (OP) for several things:
1. Not going to the anchor line and ascending in the blue. In that case, you don't know what you don't know. The dive briefing should have covered this. Could you have approached it differently? Sure, if you'd known. You didn't AND SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN EXPECTED TO.
2. Sharing air on the bottom for the purpose of conserving air is not something you are taught and not something I'd have done in this situation. For OW classes, the mantra is when a diver is out of air and their buddy is at hand, they should share air. There's no "well, if they're low maybe share air for awhile" drill you're taught. When I've had divers in classes low on air, I've brought them to the safety stop and while doing a lot of nothing for 3 minutes let them breathe off my tank or a pony. But they'd have to be nearly out on the bottom before I'd share air there, and we would be going straight to the surface once the diver was calmed down.
I'm going to assume PADI (playing the odds and thinking most agencies offering AOW are likely similar).
1. You can mix students with non-students in an instructional dive per standards, but they do count against ratios. So if it's just one instructor, there shouldn't be more than 8 total customers (students and guided divers) in the group. Sounds like that's violation number 1. (Also, IMHO, there are limited times when this should happen. E.g., if you have somebody that just wants to refresh skills a bit, or wants to watch their friend or relative learn, or it's a person thinking of becoming a DM or somesuch. Putting folks who are in a class with folks expecting a guided tour is a disservice to the guided divers at best.)
2. If this dive was deeper than 18 m and you had not already done the deep dive of AOW, then there's a standards violation.
3. If this dive was deeper than 18 m the instructor is required to directly supervise the student divers throughout. Any separation is the instructors' fault.
4. If penetration was involved, the instructor is required to directly supervise the student throughout. Again, any separation is the instructors' fault.
5. Wreck penetration is not allowed for students doing dive 1 of the wreck course or a wreck dive as part of AOW. And while I could sort of see doing an easy "swim through" penetration (e.g., the bow deckhouse area on El Aguila in Roatan), that wasn't what this guy was doing: You couldn't see the group from the entry site.
6. We're so far out of line already that I hesitate to mention this, but what the heck. If you ARE doing a wreck penetration as part of a wreck course, your student : instructor ratio is 2:1. Even if this was a subsequent dive and otherwise legitimate from a training perspective, the fact that he took students plus the tourists into the wreck is yet another violation.
I'm not going to fault you (OP) for several things:
1. Not going to the anchor line and ascending in the blue. In that case, you don't know what you don't know. The dive briefing should have covered this. Could you have approached it differently? Sure, if you'd known. You didn't AND SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN EXPECTED TO.
2. Sharing air on the bottom for the purpose of conserving air is not something you are taught and not something I'd have done in this situation. For OW classes, the mantra is when a diver is out of air and their buddy is at hand, they should share air. There's no "well, if they're low maybe share air for awhile" drill you're taught. When I've had divers in classes low on air, I've brought them to the safety stop and while doing a lot of nothing for 3 minutes let them breathe off my tank or a pony. But they'd have to be nearly out on the bottom before I'd share air there, and we would be going straight to the surface once the diver was calmed down.
Im by no means an expert and have leas than 20 dives under my belt as just an OW diver. I do want to say kudos OP. While there is probably blame to be laid on you and maybe that is deserved. But kudos for being attentive and recognizing a problem. You made a decision based off what you saw being expressed to you. A low air/out of air situation is nerve racking not only for the person low/out but also for the inexperienced divers around them.
Regardless of the hate you may have gotten I believe you potentially saved a life. You were dealing with 2 distressed divers(one with mask issues and the low air diver) and made a decision to surface off the anchor line. I cant comment on how dangerous that is because it is out of my wheelhouse. But you kept a person alive and more important you were aware of your surroundings and other divers to be able to act quickly.
Im sure I will get berated for chiming out n as inexperienced as I am. But I find your action admirable and appreciate that you are taking the time to reflect and grow in your actions.
Bravo OP. Some here may have acted perfectly in their perfectly trained manner. Others may have done what you did. And still others may have freaked completely out and caused a potentially deadly scenario.
Regardless of the hate you may have gotten I believe you potentially saved a life. You were dealing with 2 distressed divers(one with mask issues and the low air diver) and made a decision to surface off the anchor line. I cant comment on how dangerous that is because it is out of my wheelhouse. But you kept a person alive and more important you were aware of your surroundings and other divers to be able to act quickly.
Im sure I will get berated for chiming out n as inexperienced as I am. But I find your action admirable and appreciate that you are taking the time to reflect and grow in your actions.
Bravo OP. Some here may have acted perfectly in their perfectly trained manner. Others may have done what you did. And still others may have freaked completely out and caused a potentially deadly scenario.
happy-diver
Skindiver Just feelin it
- Messages
- 5,494
- Reaction score
- 4,909
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
As you are here attempting to re constuct what must have been a traumatic time faced with so much
detail and you've decided that your offshoot is in danger and headed for the surface, there is no way
you could know the outcome of staying with your group, as you did not do the same dive, with them
Instead you decided to freelance, split the dive group, and put two groups under unnecessary stress
With the outcome of either of these scenarios being, just another day in the world, just another dive
Similar threads
