• Welcome to ScubaBoard


  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

Scubapro MK20 upgrade to MK25

Discussion in 'Regulators' started by dave22387, Apr 11, 2019.

  1. abnfrog

    abnfrog Tech Instructor

    # of Dives: 2,500 - 4,999
    Location: great white north
    1,295
    760
    113
    upgrade downgrade its all BS plastic was cheaper to make .....that's why they switched for gods sake !!!!
     
  2. Pavao

    Pavao Manta Ray

    505
    151
    43
    To make it more expensive to make the regs, since they have been using metal for some years now?
    See my point about the ones using titanium barrel, or have I misunderstood your point?
     
  3. lexvil

    lexvil Loggerhead Turtle

    # of Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
    Location: jamestown, ca.
    1,349
    896
    113
    I would like to point out that there is an ignore feature on this website, it’s wonderful.
     
  4. couv

    couv Instructor, Scuba

    # of Dives: 1,000 - 2,499
    Location: 13th floor of the Ivory Tower
    4,586
    1,818
    113
    @Pavao

    OK back to civility now. Please elaborate on this point. I've heard the same from an engineer friend; but rather than miss-quote him or worse, get it wrong, I'd like to hear a little more detail.

    Thank you,

    Couv
     
  5. rsingler

    rsingler Scuba Instructor, Tinkerer in Brass Staff Member ScubaBoard Sponsor

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: Napa, California
    2,874
    3,108
    113
    Interestingly, I decided to look back into this issue, since the statement above was contested.
    The short answer is yes and no. @jchance is right, and @Pavao is right.
    While the Mk25 schematics show a .219 shim between the spring and the reg body, when the composite piston was first introduced for the Mk20 at the time of the Mk25 release, Service Bulletin #272 for converting a Mk20 to a Mk25 states on page 2, "Note that when installing these kits, no shims (01.060.219 or 01.060.220) should be used."

    Most techs would say that putting a shim on top of the piston decreases rust deposition from the spring deep in the body, but it's not wrong to leave it out, per Scubapro above. If you're having trouble getting a low enough IP, that's the first place I'd start. I've even put a spring on a low speed belt sander (to avoid changing metal temper) and taken 0.2mm off one end with good results. All on the DIY side, of course. SP would never endorse that move.
     

    Attached Files:

    jchance, couv and rhwestfall like this.
  6. jchance

    jchance Nassau Grouper

    # of Dives: 5,000 - ∞
    Location: Tennessee
    150
    12
    18
    Thanks rsingler. Opinions are like (left unsaid) but everyone has one. That said, I usually put just the thin one in to serve somewhat like a washer (as shown in some of the newer schematics) unless I have a problem getting the pressures I want but that is just a personal preference not endorsed by Scubapro.
     

Share This Page