Lopez116
Contributor
I understand there may have been a beef between the parties, but what did the hammerhead do???
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I'd be willing to bet the hammerhead was going to be taken regardless of this plan or not. They most likely decided to make use of the head instead of throwing it out.I understand there may have been a beef between the parties, but what did the hammerhead do???
I'd be willing to bet the hammerhead was going to be taken regardless of this plan or not. They most likely decided to make use of the head instead of throwing it out.
Cause Alzheimers?Not,just that BMAA is present in patients and sharks no causation is documented.Mercury in seafood is a chimera that isn't quantifiable reliably as species diets change as well as the level in local forage.Not that it's good to eat seafood linked to mercury content,it's just not reliably predictable as too the level present.PUBMED has a wealth of info on the relative risks on all dietary items but please do look at the abstract to see who the researchers are,where they study and Whom is picking up the bill.It is easy to get two equally credible scientists to find diametrically opposing conclusions just by giving them a grant from two organizations with differing views.And a million dollars for a shark?Hyperbole,surely.
Some friends of mine with a Cranchi Yacht have met and run along with Octopussy ( though not nearly as fast, so not for long ....Funny thing you mentioned Octopussy in your edit.I have had family paint that boat.small world.
I'm not a big fan of catch and release for larger species.Do a google on ocearch or any other large animal research and see what the release mortality is.Smaller fish don't have a huge mass of organs and are subdued sooner.The fatigue poisons build up in larger fish as well as there is the predation issue.Deeper caught demersal fish have the swim bladder to consider as well.
Large pelagics should either be eaten or viewed and to hell with the money.The idea of killing thousand pound animals so Joe from Idaho can have vid of his release doesn't jive with my view of stewardship.Unless I see evidence of really low release mortality I don't fish a species.If I start catching them I move and note the location and time of year.