Taking the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (N7100) underwater

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

More HDRed photos. Not that sharp but they should be enough to impress non-divers. :D

10363262_875470259137245_6848257731816987514_n.jpg10367580_875505985800339_3572698072854079887_n.jpg10390555_875506679133603_8940449358008198681_n.jpg
 
Then again there is the iGill for the iPhone which not only allows you to take photos but has an app and sensors to act as a dive computer.
Add also Smart Dive Buddy. Works with iPhone 4S, 5 and 5S and with Samsung Galaxy S3 and S4
 
IMG-20140709-WA0002.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0003.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0004.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0005.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0006.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0007.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0008.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0009.jpgIMG-20140709-WA0010.jpg

Again these won't win any awards but this time, none of them, other than some cropping, had been edited so as I understood the (huge) limitations and capabilities of the phone, it became possible to take some fairly decent photos. Most were either underexposed or overblown but the catchword is 'limitations'. :D

Ironically enough, these were the last of the underwater shots because some seawater got into the Note 2 when it was in my gear box on a day when it wasn't taken underwater!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
View attachment 188361View attachment 188362View attachment 188363View attachment 188364View attachment 188365View attachment 188366View attachment 188367View attachment 188368View attachment 188369

Again these won't win any awards but this time, none of them, other than some cropping, had been edited so as I understood the (huge) limitations and capabilities of the phone, it became possible to take some fairly decent photos. Most were either underexposed or overblown but the catchword is 'limitations'. :D

Ironically enough, these were the last of the underwater shots because some seawater got into the Note 2 when it was in my gear box on a day when it wasn't taken underwater!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Clown fish shots were as good as plenty that were posted by DSLR shooting divers....I would not want to do a paid shoot with a Note 3, but......I would make a bet that someone like David Doubilet of nat Geo, could take a Note 3 down on a shallow reef, and blow away the "normal" DSLR shooters on the same boat with his results.
 
Wouldn't mind if someone made an underwater case for my Nokia 1020 since it has the best camera of any phone out there. However since none exist, rather just get a Gopro for $300 for some solid video and not risk my $500 phone.
 
I think the point is that as of yet, GoPro does not record in 4k.
 
You give me too much credit, buddy. It was just a Note 2 in a cheapo plastic pouch and not even one of the better plastic pouches from Korea but the really cheap ones from China. :D
 
You give me too much credit, buddy. It was just a Note 2 in a cheapo plastic pouch and not even one of the better plastic pouches from Korea but the really cheap ones from China. :D

What I described could be caused by the type of lens/port setup, or some other optically imperfect light transfer to the camera's lens.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom