US Tosses Rule to Protect Endangered Whales and Sea Turtles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Sea Save Foundation

Contributor
Messages
1,110
Reaction score
79
Location
Malibu, California
The NOAA's fisheries division announced Monday that it will toss out a pending rule that proposed limits on the number of endangered whales, dolphins, and sea turtles that are killed or injured from swordfishing gill nets off the West Coast.

“The fishery has been under pressure for years to reduce its impact, and it has been very successful doing that,” said Michael Milstein, a NOAA fisheries spokesman. “The cap would have imposed a cost on the industry to solve a problem that has already been addressed.”

Catherine Kilduff, a senior attorney for the environmental group Center for Biological Diversity, said that protections are still necessary because rare species, such as leatherback turtles, humpback whales and sperm whales, are still being killed and injured in gill nets.

Read more here.

What do you think? Are existing protections sufficient?

170613-whale-california-cr-0735_cc1c9299edbd2c565a4ef5c317c55614.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg
 
Instead of posting lame loaded questions, Sea Save should just take an editorial stance and come out and say why the protections are still needed. At face value I agree with Sea Save, I just think the approach in your posts with no follow up to the discussion is flawed.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom