Seems like a good time to review the stat.s. I count 146 votes. Only 3.4% voted others, so the choices met the preferences of the large majority. I hardly ever do a survey where I’ll fully comfortable with my answer choices on every question, so there are limits. Scuba Board members probably aren’t fully representative of the greater diving community, but there’s still something to learn here. We work with what we have. Very benign vacation conditions aren’t universal but they are very common in vacation diving, which constitutes a lot of diving.
I anticipated options 2.) & 3.) (traditional buddy system, tight or loose) would dominate pretty strongly, & 5.) & 6.) (discounting the need for a buddy, or even desiring to avoid having one) a small minority. While I threw in 1.) out of curiosity, I didn’t think even DIR-trained divers would have much desire for the level of disciplined team work and standardized gear I read of in GUE discussions. At 11.6% I was surprised by that, especially since from what I understand only a small minority of divers are DIR-trained (or similar - GUE, UTD, etc…). But the % of actively posting Scuba Board members with such training is likely higher.
If we combine 1.) & 2.), we’ve got fairly tight buddy diving, as basic OW training courses tend to push for; 30.8%. Nearly 1/3rd of poll respondents prefer disciplined ‘responsible’ buddy diving.
Combine 1.), 2.) & 3.) and we’ve cover those who prefer a specified buddy, even if some are more loose about it; 56.1%.
So far, working out like I figured, except those preferring option 1.) more prevalent than expected.
Option 4.) is what often happens on dive boat excursions; you’re one of the group, whether you supposedly had a buddy or not. 13% prefer that.
Combine 5.) & 6.) to get those who don’t seem to view a buddy as particularly important to their safety and enjoyment when diving. 21.2%. Just over 1 in 5. Solo diving has come a long way over the years, or at least the willingness to publicly favor it.
Part of what motivated this poll was to explore:
1.) Whether what mainstream dive boat operators (land-based & live-aboard) require vs. what the diving community desires. Many boats forbid solo diving. Some try to assign buddies, but some just don’t allow solo. Some allow solo if you’ve got a solo (or self-reliant) cert. & solo-gear. Some don’t try to dictate what you do (hello, California!).
2.) Whether what mainstream training agencies (e.g.: PADI) endorse in OW is what the customer base wants once they get more seasoned. PADI’s emphasis on buddy diving did a number of my wife & an old friend’s heads in training; they drank the Koolaid and my solo diving bugs my wife.
3.) Whether oft-voiced buddy system expectations on our forum community are a good match for real world practices. When we get an accident/incident thread with a fatality, we may see someone post asking ‘Where was the buddy?’ That seems to imply if someone goes into dire distress, the buddy is duty-bound to notice and discern that within some maximum time frame, and intervene (hence the old debates on what & how much rescue skills training should occur in OW courses). I wonder if such perception could encourage some to forego buddy diving because they don’t want to shoulder that responsibility?
Thanks to everyone who participated!
Richard.
Side note: My nearest miss I'm aware of diving was in warm slightly deeper than knee deep water so I too have a respect for even benign conditions.
Over the years I've read 2 accounts of shore entry divers falling & getting their tank wedged, trapping them. In one case someone helped & the diver survived, but IIRC (been a long time since I read about it) I think there's been one fatality from such an event. And while the conditions under which our very popular forum member Quero (Marcia) died diving weren't as benign as what I described, they should've been well within her capabilities, and her death after buddy separation (IIRC) was a frustrating mystery.
Richard.