- Messages
- 7,660
- Reaction score
- 4,717
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
Ha!!! Interesting concept.But can't I just tune out a Staff Member or two? Just for a bit?
Why not just put them all on ignore? <wink>
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Ha!!! Interesting concept.But can't I just tune out a Staff Member or two? Just for a bit?
If we need you to know something, we can always use PM or email.
- I cannot "Ignore" a Staff Member - so it does appear as though they do in fact get special privilege.
OMG! I had no idea that this existed. I typed in sunsite, what a blast from the past!
I didn’t mean me personally, I meant all staff.It is one of those things - I go through ups and downs and conversations hit me differently at times. So I like to toggle people on and off...
Even those I do not agree with can sometimes show me a different thought or correct me - but when folks go off the rails - my interpretation - I like to ignore them for a bit...
But that is just me - and this was not aimed at you... I had someone else in mind... lol
** added **
BTW - I can ignore you because you took the Staff Member banner off your profile... But why would I ignore you? You have given me good advice when I asked....
what do YOU do?
Wayback Machine - it is very usefull thing!OMG! I had no idea that this existed. I typed in sunsite, what a blast from the past!
Endless thanks, my friend.
Your post began with “pdwake said” and ended with a request. Presumably, then, you’re suggesting I said the thing in the post you’re questioning, that you want me to reply to. Here is why I’m not going to accede to your demand. Quotation marks mean that one is quoting what someone else is saying. It might be to approve of it, or to disapprove of it, or (as in this case) to respond to a request for a thread summary by providing a variety of quotes that summarize the thread. If you want to address what the quoted person said, you can engage with them directly (although I do note that the answer to your question has already been spelled out, repeatedly). That would make more sense. If this was the first time in this thread that you’ve misstated or misconstrued what I have said, I’d just let it go. But perhaps I’ll just suggest that some proofreading of content before hitting Reply might be good.Please show me where the staff attacked the OP.
Would be an interesting feature request to have any member be able to ignore other members, staff, moderators etc unless the MOD tags were used within the post.We absolutely do have special permissions not available to members.
And collectively we spend thousands of hours volunteering our time to keep the b board running - what do YOU do?
It's actually not within our control to change, the SW nfr. hard coded it into any oversight positions.