Atomic_Diver
Scubaboard Enthusiast
Which came first, the bird or the egg? 
Your Opinion Needed!
- Thread starter Atomic_Diver
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
OP
Atomic_Diver
Scubaboard Enthusiast
RICHinNC
Contributor
I have always answered that question the same way.
If you are a big literal Bible believer, then the bird came first.
If you are not a big Bible believer in the sense of creation, then neither came first. The one cell organism they came from came first.
As long as it ends up in KFC.....who cares?????
If you are a big literal Bible believer, then the bird came first.
If you are not a big Bible believer in the sense of creation, then neither came first. The one cell organism they came from came first.
As long as it ends up in KFC.....who cares?????
OP
Atomic_Diver
Scubaboard Enthusiast
What about Evolution?
The egg; genetic material doesn't change during an animal's life. Therefore the first bird that evolved, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg. :headscratch:
OP
Atomic_Diver
Scubaboard Enthusiast
OP
Atomic_Diver
Scubaboard Enthusiast
Blah.. This is going nowhere.. Ok I will up the discussion: anyone have something to say about globel warming?...
santafejoe
Contributor
Yes and No. To early to tell. Does anyone really care?
Scuba Do
Contributor
It's not called global warming anymore because that does not explain the cooling. Now, it is climate change. I have no idea if this is occurring and what role, if any, humans play in this. I am just tired of self-interested people telling us we just have to believe their research. If you have information, share it, honestly. People on both sides have a stake in the resolution (Gore, for example, is making millions on green technology, which he is trying to force everyone to use through fear, not science). Sadly, this is an important issue, but both sides have lost so much credibility. Let's put the science on both sides on the table and honestly, and with out politics weighing in, decide: 1) is the atmosphere warming; if so, 2) is human behavior significantly responsible; and, if so, 3) what is a reasoned solution?
Similar threads
