Backing off from technical diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

This strikes a chord with me.

'Tech' vs 'rec' diving has always appeared to be a very artificial, and apparently US-centric construct. In many places, mostly under CMAS influence, diving is a continuous progression, with early certifications being on how to avoid deco, but with full training in tables, deco stops (even if they are initially only safety stops) and a good grounding in theory. But full deco follows pretty quickly, often in their second qualification, and is then widely and routinely performed. Similarly, Nx and accelerated deco follow almost routinely.

Many divers that develop through a system like this tend to have periods where they tend to do more simple dives, often <40 m with limited deco, and then other times where they are doing harder 60m dives with stages and accelerated deco. I am a good example of this in that over the last few years I have done many 50-60m dives with accelerated deco (mostly on EANx 80 as that is the French standard - so no flames about that please!), but recently because of limited time, coupled with a lack of interesting sites locally in this depth I have mostly done no deco dives.

Similarly, those that are trimix (and they are as rare as rocking horse droppings here in France - cos they love their deep air) tend to slip up and down the scale as well, with periods of intense diving, and periods of calmer diving.

Diving is just one long continuum and we all tend to move up and down it.

best

Jon
 
In many places, mostly under CMAS influence,....

You mean, "In France...". :wink:

...diving is a continuous progression,

As it is with anyone else. :) Others just draw a chalk line between 'immediate access to the surface' and 'no immediate access to the surface'. Access to the surface being 40m linear distance, no restrictions to immediate ascent. Depending on agency, that means never more than 2-4 minutes from an infinite air supply...and survival. Further feint chalk lines differentiate the use of hyper or hypoxic gas mixtures and their usage for specific purposes...'hard' overheads etc etc etc

It's all quite continuous, regardless of where the chalk lines are drawn. The chalk lines merely represent a change in necessary mindset (where the surface is no longer an immediate option) and the need for more standardized equipment configuration - to provide adequate redundancy whilst minimizing risks.
 
Most tech divers dont use air. Or atleast the ones I know dont. The goal isnt to go into deco. The goal is to be able to conduct the dives you want even if that means going into decompression and making it back to the surface safely with your team. Air is typically not the best choice for this.
There are plenty of places where He is NOT available.

Then dont do that dive.
 
Then dont do that dive.

Says the man based in Florida, with unrestricted access to cheap He...

Good point. In fairness I just moved here. All im saying is if you cant get He and its needed then pick a new site.
 
Good point. In fairness I just moved here. All im saying is if you cant get He and its needed then pick a new site.

You do realize that there are places in the world where He supply is unreliable? I'm not talking 'the Mid-West USA'... I'm talking third-world countries... tropical islands..

Don't think I'm advocating deep air diving... I'm just trying to raise a genuine issue. "Picking a new site" isn't always an option.
 
I am the opposite. In the last 4 years I have not done a dive without an obligation. I really enjoy a 60-90 minute soak. If that happens at 80 fsw or 200fsw it is all the same to me. Where I spend the majority of that time is all that changes.
Eric

And yes I have my own filling station and am fully addicted to he.
 
I'm the friend Lynne mentioned in the opening post ... and the trip I just returned from was to the Great Lakes, diving some of the wrecks in Lake Superior, Michigan and Huron. They were fantastic, and I had a great time ... but it's unlikely I'll go back. Life and interests have moved me in other directions. A trip to the Great Lakes is something I've wanted to do for years ... and it definitely lived up to my expectations. But it's the most deep diving I've done in about three years, and I came to realize that in the interim my interests have changed. Back when I first got into trimix diving, I did quite a bit of it in the 160-220 foot range ... and it called to me. Now I prefer longer, shallower dives that involve critters and photography ... it's just where my interests have taken me.

We did some signature dives last week, including my deepest solo dive (the Uganda in Lake Michigan) and deepest ever dive (Superior City in Lake Superior) ... and they were both fantastic. But I just didn't derive that sense of satisfaction I get from poking around looking into holes, occasionally finding a critter that's rare or new to me, or getting that signature shot that I'm proud to show off to my friends.

We all dive for our own reasons ... and sometimes those reasons change with your experiences. Deep tech diving once appealed to me ... but I discovered on this past trip that for me it's moved into the category of "been there, done that" ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
 
I'm just getting back into technical diving. I did the training and did some dives (not many) while I was still living in Malaysia, but since coming to Thailand eight years ago, I've done none until this year when I started my cave training. I am simply not attracted by wrecks, I guess, or at least I've never been to a wreck that has made me want to return to it or even to explore others--though maybe there's one out there, and I'd give it another try if I were to find myself at Subic. But I got my certs a long time ago, and it was deep air and decompression training. I never followed up with trimix training. I long wondered why I had gone to the trouble and expense of getting even that level of technical training since I wasn't using it nor did I even yearn to, but it did come in handy when I did the tech sidemount course recently. I subsequently did my cave training in sidemount, so it's all coming together.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom