k4sdi
Contributor
NetDoc once bubbled...
The very best way to deal with an OOA is to prevent it.
There You Go!!!!
Mark
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
NetDoc once bubbled...
The very best way to deal with an OOA is to prevent it.
k4sdi once bubbled...
There You Go!!!!
Mark
JohnStrr once bubbled...
I got paired up with a total idiot (I hate to say stroke) on my first ocean dive, I barely even saw him, and this is after talking about it on the boat. I guess he hit the water and forgot everything. Needless to say I stayed with the DM, he for one didn't mind having an extra tank nearby him .
The technique predates GUE considerably. Are they claiming it as their own?roakey once bubbled...
The only "GUE Technique" I know of that involves breathing off the inflator is not an OOA technique, it's a failure of the backup regulator while already sharing air technique (or something similar).
It involves pressing the inflator and dump vales at the same time AND BREATHING THE AIR BEING SUPPLIED BY THE CYLINDER, not the bag. This is one of the reasons given for the inflator to come off the right post, though far from the primary reason.
Think "manual demand regulator."
Roak
No more thanRick Murchison once bubbled...
The technique predates GUE considerably. Are they claiming it as their own?
Rick
Even at 60 fpm you would be on the surface in 75 secs. Even with partially filled lungs, you would have more than enough air and would arrive way before hypoxia could set in. This would apply mostly to in-attentive solo divers or to in-attentive divers who also lost track of their buddy. Obviously these types of divers wouldn't make good candidates for "Diver of the Year".Totally irrellelavent when your alternative is breathing water.
Fins Wake referred to "This is my understanding of GUE:s (sic) technique..." I was merely using the same terminology to make reference to Fins Wake's post, hence the double quotes around "GUE Techinique" denoting a not-generally-accepted usage of the phrase.Rick Murchison once bubbled...
The technique predates GUE considerably. Are they claiming it as their own?
I don't think GUE has come up with a single original idea on their own, nor do I think they have ever laid claim to one, either.