I understand exactly what you are saying - but look at this way, for an extreme example.
The remarks made by Hitler and Stalin may be "out of context" in 2008, but the message still comes across in the exact same manner, and it's still just as ****** up.
The conduct displayed in what I've seen of that man is not justified in any manner by anything that was happening at that time. Screaming and yelling, cussing and throwing a fit to anyone who will listen has been an internet thing since it's inception. He didn't patent it, or coin a new internet debate procedure by doing it.
Apparently you have never been to a Redneck Bar. If you are tallking to certain "groups" of people, the "way" your message is phrased better be closer to George's message, or there will be no thought other than ridicule, given to the "polite" idea.
Again, the personalities were different back then. And his Internet personna was nothing like George in person ( most of the time
.......
Also.....if you are married, imagine there was an instructor who was teaching your wife cave or tech courses. You find out he has just put her in catastrophic jeopardy---although she survived, and has convinced her to do and even stupider dive plan tommorow. The question then, is how far do you have a "DUTY" and desire to go, to stop this guy before ( in your mind) he gets your wife killed, and how far should you escalate this to make sure this guy does not kill anyone in the next weeks or months, with the behaviors you KNOW he is utilizing.
I can show real examples of this, and many of them. This was not just isolated incidents, and a great many of George's predictions did in fact, come true--deaths resulted, many of them, from just exactly the planning and behavior he had exploded about.
Why "should" you be nice to a guy who is threatening the life of one of your loved ones, or even just a friend, or acquaintence. What possible "right" does the instructor have, to perform what you feel you KNOW is catastrophicaly dangerous?
I believe, such a person should be treated as scum. Perhaps you believe that everyone EXCEPT George is inhernetly a nice person, and should always be given the benefit of the doubt.....I believe, that in the dive industry, there are lots of great people, and plenty of greedy, selfish people, that are inhernetly bad more often than they are good. You have to figure out what side of the continuum each dive person is in, and treat them accordingly. I would be as comfortable killing a child molestor and rapist as I would be a cockroach, and I believe our current system of justice for such matters has nothing to do with "Justice", and everything to do with expedience and income for the prison corporations. If you want "justice", it would be rare that an expectation that the system would deliver it for you would occur...thus, if you needed justice for your wife or your child, you would be a fool not to take personal stake in the matter, and find a way to actually search out Justice.
George aspired to prevent many more deaths, before they were perpetrated. This does NOT make him a Hitler or a stalin. Perhaps he made demeaning comments about someone you know--I do not know why you have such an axe to grind with him. What I do know is that you have missed the motivations, and you have missed the piotential solutions that were available at the time----since no one else stepped up to the plate for many of the issues we are discussing, apparently George was the only one up to playing his part in protecting student divers.
Regards,
Dan Volker