Whatgoesdown:Should a ten year old be allowed to ride a bike, play football or hockey, swim or surf in the ocean etc? All of these activities carry a significant risk and lack the fail-safes and backups of correctly conducted diving. At some point, children have to be introduced to risk. Why not do it in a controlled manner, with structured training? I'm not suggesting that we try to certify every child out there but those with the aptitude, intelligence and desire to learn should not be denied. By the age of ten I had already swum a mile, could swim 50 yards underwater on one breath ...and had to wait another four years before I got an opportunity to dive! I personally wish that I had started earlier and would not deny someone in the same position. It is not easy to put yourself in the position of a child but you can try and remember yourself at that age. As an instructor, I preferred the 12 limit but I have the choice to accept or deny a student, regardless of age (and have done so across the board).
First of all I'm not saying that there should be a law against it or anything. Only that I, as an instructor, wanted no part of it. There are some differences between diving and things like bike riding and playing football. For one, most football and bike riding mishaps result in sprains, bruises and maybe a break here and there. You can fall down and wait for some one to come and pick you up. It doesn't work that way underwater. Look back at what I wrote about the kid who's mother freaked in the water. That kid didn't remind me of a kid who just fell off his bike and got banged up. He seemed more like a kid who was just in a terrible car accident and saw things he wasn't ready to see. He was one very upset little boy and seeing what I saw made me want to shake some sense into somebody. What on earth made those people think they were able to supervise any one else in the water? Some bunk they heard in a dive shop or a PADI add no doubt.
Kids take to the phisical skills of diving easily. Shoot diving is phisically easy. As I said, I worry about the skill of the parents supervising and how that relates to a child who isn't in a position to pick his own dive buddies.
But...I really feel for you having to wait until you were 14 to dive, BTW. When I was 10, like you, I could swim or run all day. I did some diving without being certified on and off from about my mid 20's because I had some family who walked into some gear. I was never in a position to buy certification, equipment and babysitters until I was in my 30's. When I was 12 those were the days of eating 2 cookies at a time or pouring three fingers of coke into a glass and putting the rubber stopper in the bottle before returning it to the frige because if there were cookies or pop there was only that little bit until the next shopping day...That is if there was extra money for such things. Anyway, no one was going diving. That was something you saw on TV and who would have ever thought that real people did it? Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining. We were never without anything we really needed and it isn't cookies, pop or even diving that make one content. I look at my own kids. When the pop is gone they expect some one to pick up another case! My son started diving with me when he was 13 or so. He's 20 and he still takes it for granted. I'm grateful I had the chance to do so much diving with him but it would mean more to him if he had to go after it and pay the bill himself. My kids missed so much of life because they had too much junk. So should we deny them? Oh no, how dare we?