plcmd:
My wife enrolled in the PADI O/W class two weeks ago. On her first day they went thru the "Book". (In five hours) On her second day they went to the pool and spent an hour or so going thru the equipment set up. They then spent 5 or 6 hours in the pool. This coming weekend they are going to the lake and going to do the checkout dives. In my humble opinion this is a little fast. I got my cert in 86 and it sure seems to me like we had several classes, several pool dives and I do remember that it wasnt the second week that we went to the lake. Maybe I am blowing this out of proportion, maybe not. Do you think this is enough time to grasp the skills that are necessary to be a safe diver? I'm just having a really hard time accepting this. Any input?
I have a similar experience to yours. I got certified through PADI in 1984. At that time we had 5 weeks of 1 or 2 classes per week along with quite a bit of pool time. Then we had 6 open water dives. I don't remember exactly how many hours there were all together, but it was by far more than my sons got when they got certified through PADI in the last few years.
I was inactive in diving until about 6 years ago when I started diving again and received my Advanced Open Water and Rescue Diver certs through PADI. When I took the AOW course I was immediately dissapointed because I had already done everything in the AOW class except a deep dive and dry suit (which was great) in my original Open Water Class.
My first son got certified through PADI a few years ago, and I was horrified at how very little he had to learn and practice to earn his Open Water cert. He covered the entire book in two short classroom sessions, had two pool sessions, then did his Open Water Dives. I thought the book was very weak, and the entire class gave all of the students a bare minimum of skills and knowledge to avoid killing themselves on their first free dive. The instructor was a PADI course developer, so he was supposed to be one of the cream of the crop, yet he was a very disappointing teacher.
I paid for the AOW class for my son just so he would finally have the skills and knowledge to be somewhat safe. Even then, the AOW class is mis-labeled -- it should not be called "Advanced". I think most of the skills taught through AOW are just the ones that should already be included in basic open water, not because that is how I did it back in 1984, but because it just makes sense from a safety and enjoyment point of view.
When I watched the students in my son's class floundering around and struggling on their last Open Water dive, it was obvious that they were not yet ready to be turned loose. No one expected them to be as smooth as a diver with hundreds of dives, but they did not display the basic competancy that they should have to be safe.
I have since then tagged along with some other junior Open Water students who got a wonderful class through PADI only because the instructor and shop went far above and beyond the minimum requirements of PADI.
I went on to earn a couple of other specialty ratings through PADI, not because I wanted to use PADI by then, but because I had no other choices in the area I lived in at the time. I was almost as disappointed with the specialty classes.
After all of this experience with the new PADI, my opinion is that PADI seems to be geared more toward marketing and money making oportunities for PADI and the shops rather than what makes sense and is safe for the students.
It is such a shame because PADI could and should be one of the best dive instruction organizations in the world. I hope they come to their senses.
I am now working on Dive Control Specialist through SSI. Even though SSI has some of its own weaknesses, so far I am much more pleased with its common sense and more comprehensive approach to diving education. At least it does not appear to focused on being as much of a "marketing machine" as PADI.
P.S. It is interesting to note that PADI's 800 number is "800-PAY-PADI".