And tables also have a number of advantages all their own. If you do a couple dozen dives with tables, you'll probably find you have most of the first dive NDL's memorized. [/quoet] Same with PDcs.
That means that without a table, computer or anything, you've got a pretty good idea of how long you can safely stay down at different depths without getting bent,
Same with PDCs
I'm not saying that tables are better though. Computers are simpler, more convenient and give you longer dives, but tables have a few advantages of their own and should still be taught.
You haven't presented any yet.
Other reasons why we don't spend time on tables:
- Overtasking: I have far more important things for students to remember. Ascent protocols, buddy skills, gas management, and more.
- Under utilized: Why teach something that they will refuse to use?
- Fear factor: I know of people who have refused to get certified because they were terrified of tables.
- Fat fingers: PDCs might crap out, but the error rate on people working tables is simply astounding.
- PDCs don't get narced: Tables are almost useless at depth if the diver exceeds their projected depth and gets narced. PDCs handle this seemlessly.
- Inadvertant Deco: Entanglements and lost buddies can lead to inadvertant deco obligations that often exceed table limits.
- Multi-level dives: tables are unable to deal with this common type of dive.
- No alarms: Tables can't remind the diver when a limit is about to be exceded or when it actually happens. This includes Ascent, NDL, MOD, O2 Exposure and sometimes gas supply.
- Record Keeping: Depths, bottom times and stop times are recorded providing the smart diver a keen insight into their diving habits.