Reasons NOT to use Enriched Air?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The arguement made for 1.6 exposure at 130 (with 32%) was that there was a problem with the oxygen clock for 3 repet dives.. Thall.. shows that the no-deco limits will be the governing constraint.

However, if someone were to use a "rich mix" at a shallower depth (say using 40% at 100 ft) it would be closer to getting the diver into oxygen trouble rather than deco, especially if the SI were an hour or so.. yes?
 
Yes, and if I used 100% at 18 feet ...
 
Sorry I guess it was pretty obvious
 


A ScubaBoard Staff Message...


hi guys, OP has requested that this thread be closed

but

i will be copying this thread, doing a cleanup and then posting it in the "Advanced Scuba Discussions" forum later on...
it will take me a few hours to complete the job (sat arvo and im in the office right now)
so if you wish to continue with the topic, keep an eye out for it in a few hours

many thanks



 
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom