• Welcome to ScubaBoard


  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

Remember when Nitrox was "Devil Gas?"

Discussion in 'Basic Scuba Discussions' started by charlesml3, Oct 12, 2007.

  1. charlesml3

    charlesml3 Manta Ray

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: Raleigh, NC
    1,006
    114
    0
    Gang,

    I was reading another forum and someone reminded me of this. I remember wandering into the LDS that certified me when Nitrox was just beginning to be discussed. I forget what year that was... Maybe early 90's?

    Anyway, I asked about it and the owner spit right back "What? That Devil Gas? We'll never fill any tanks with that stuff here!" I tried to turn down the emotion and actually talk about the physiology but she was having nothing to do with it. Just more ranting about "Devil Gas." Seriously here. I felt like I was talking to some 13th century alchemist who was trying to turn lead into gold. I was just silly and not the first, nor last time I'd heard that term used when referring to Nitrox.

    I remember a bunch of people got together and tried to ban Nitrox from the DEMA show floor one year. Ban it? Come on now. This is an industry that thrives on change. We need change. We need to constantly be looking at better ways to do things. I sure don't remember anyone crying when those silly horse collar BCs with the stupid CO2 cartridge went away.

    A couple of years later that same LDS mentioned above started filling Nitrox. But even then, it was rather bizarre. They'd ask you where you were diving and would refuse to give you any more of a mix than the maximum depth you could hit on that site. Even if you clearly explained that you were going to stay on top of the wreck, you still got a mixture for the bottom. Made for some really silly mixtures sometimes. I remember once they told me I was getting 25%. Please. That isn't even worth the effort. Or extra money.

    Now everyone offers Nitrox. Any LDS that doesn't is probably going to be short lived. I dive it every chance I get. I know it's just human nature to be resistant to change but it's still disappointing to see people just knee-jerk a response and call it "Devil Gas."

    -Charles
     
  2. Thalassamania

    Thalassamania Diving Polymath ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives:
    Location: On a large pile of smokin' A'a, the most isolated
    22,159
    2,735
    0
    But you have to understand the real reason that the industry power brokers were against it: it did not appear to offer a large increase in profits to anyone and it provided additional bottom time which screwed up the boat and meal schedule at the resorts.
     
  3. Walter

    Walter Instructor, Scuba

    18,583
    321
    83
    That was the same time (mid 80s) computers were starting to become popular. Computers were doing exactly the same thing. There was no real advantage of increased bottom time with nitrox over diving the Edge as with nitrox you were limited to tables, no nitrox computers yet. There was also lots of resistance to allowing divers to follow their computers.
     
  4. drbill

    drbill The Lorax for the Kelp Forest

    # of Dives:
    Location: Santa Catalina Island, CA
    20,970
    3,424
    113
    What do you mean Nitrox "was" Devil Gas? Still is IMHO. Why? Because it limits the depth I can "freely" go to when I encounter an interesting video subject near Nitrox's MOD. Besides, it's also called "Geezer Gas," And I don't want to admit I'm already there!
     
  5. BHB ScubaTroll

    BHB ScubaTroll Solo Diver

    # of Dives:
    Location: Florida Diver
    6,601
    448
    83
    You mean to tell me it's not Devil Gas?
     
  6. Thalassamania

    Thalassamania Diving Polymath ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives:
    Location: On a large pile of smokin' A'a, the most isolated
    22,159
    2,735
    0
    Computers I think were a little different. Nitrox was a real uphill slog compared to computers. Back then Navy tables were the 11th commandment and even other tables were suspect, there was great resistance to DCIEM and Huggins, etc. I really think that that people did not trust computers and gained trust as a result of the AAUS Catalina Diving Computer Worklshop. The change was amazing, we went out to Catalinia with almost the entire community opposed to computers, and it almost seemed that when we returned we stepped of the boat into an entirely different world ... computers were fine and everyone wanted one.
     
  7. BHB ScubaTroll

    BHB ScubaTroll Solo Diver

    # of Dives:
    Location: Florida Diver
    6,601
    448
    83
    I've seen this stance before...

    I love taking extra pictures and longer movies when I can reach a 120 min. bottom time at a max depth of 60'... I feel like I'm...

    Runnin' with the Devil.. (Gas.... come on sing with me...) :14:
     
  8. charlesml3

    charlesml3 Manta Ray

    # of Dives: 500 - 999
    Location: Raleigh, NC
    1,006
    114
    0
    Yea, that was probably it. It's funny to see how the first reaction to anything like this is always the same. "No." That's it. No time spend looking at it to see if there's a way to make a profit in a changing market. Same stupid crap the RIAA is doing now.

    True, but nobody is making you dive Nitrox. If you want the depth, then dive air and deal with a shorter NDL. Or just serve the mandatory deco stop. Your choice... Either way it isn't a reasonable argument against "Devil Gas."

    -Charles
     
  9. Joe-Diver

    Joe-Diver IDC Staff Instructor

    # of Dives: I'm a Fish!
    Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
    1,252
    12
    0
    Yeah, we always called it the "Old Man Gas".....
     
  10. Doc

    Doc Was RoatanMan

    # of Dives:
    Location: Chicago & O'Hare heading thru TSA 5x per year with
    9,229
    1,892
    113
    There is resistance to any and all change.

    Blame tort law.

    And profit margins....

    Stick around and you'll see some more examples float down the pipe. After all the LDS get bumped off, what about roadside air-fill station machines? I'll bet the last LDS in your area will fight them tooth and nail.

    In Europe, you can find vehicles with those little defogger wires we have in the rear windows. In the US, they were too afraid to even try (obstruction of vision complaints). See how long it took them to put parabolic mirrors on the right side... and then, only with the warning: "Things are really not as they seem" or something like that. The analogies hold in all industries including SCUBA.

    You guys are young folk. I have an old (but faltering memory) How about the Bend-o-Matic, single hose regs, multi windowed masks, snorkels with purges, masks without purges, the Fenzi, and more.

    Then add in the technologically explainable oddities such as the introduction of Titanium (the metal or the word) into the name of an object, digitalized eveything, split fins, the HUB, SPARE Air and other objects and concepts that had enought explanation in the marketing that they gained currency as valid steps... forward?

    You don't believe me yet? How about SCUDA?
     

Share This Page