I'm resisting the temptation to bring out the flame thower because I understand that there are divers who sincerely believe that solo diving = Russian Roulette, not because there is any evidence to support that it does, but because that's what they've been told or taught by people who also don't know.Let me offer the only story I've heard, that makes sense, on how we got the buddy system:When the YMCA decided to teach SCUBA, and they were the first to do so, their only "open water" experience was with their ocean-swimming program. Over time the "Y" validated the need to have a buddy when swimming in the ocean (waves, current, exhaustion, etc). So, when they put the first SCUBA program together they did what any of us would have done: they cut & paste from their existing ocean-swimming program, and the SCUBA-buddy system was born. Keep in mind: At the time there was no data on SCUBA diving, much less on whether or not the buddy system made sense.Let me say that there is no data that demonstrates that if you solo dive you will absolutely die, or that you will absolutely live, for that matter. I added it up the other day and I've got over 500 solo hours, so if I'm going to absolutely die doing this stuff it sure is taking its sweet time.We need to be careful when we say things in these threads, especially about "death," because they do end up getting back to our loved ones, and often end up causing them great concern. I'm sure the quote above was made in jest, but new divers see it and the solo = death myth just gets a little bigger.
Let me first say that, having met BDSC, I believe his comments were meant in jest ... I think he dives solo from time to time.
As for the YMCA program, that's generally true, although they were not the first scuba program ... that honor goes to LA County. The YMCA program was tailored after what was offered there.
Buddy diving was created at a time when cylinders were small, and SPG's weren't invented yet. People took many risks that would be considered significant by today's standards ... which is why their training was generally demanding, and those who couldn't make the grade were not certified. That business model has changed significantly over the years, and in many respects as it changed reliance on the buddy system became more and more necessary.
By today's training standards, people coming out of the entry-level classes are in no way prepared to solo dive ... hell, most of 'em aren't even prepared to dive with a buddy, which is why you see so much reliance on dive guides in vacation destinations ... and also why the second most significant reason most people take AOW is because it's "five more dives with an instructor". Personally I think if you feel the need to dive with an instructor after OW class, you shouldn't have been granted your C-card in the first place, because you failed to meet the objectives of the class. But that's another topic that's already been flogged to death on ScubaBoard.
At any rate, the buddy system works well ... but only if both divers have been trained to use it properly. Otherwise, as many of us know, diving with a buddy can be more of a liability than an asset. As it's used today, it often engenders a sense of reliance and creates a whole class of dependent divers ... something that, even in the most benign conditions should be avoided.
Solo diving boils down to a matter of choice ... it is no more or less dangerous than buddy diving ... it simply introduces a different set of risks. All diving involves risk mitigation ... understanding what the potential risks are and preparing for your dive accordingly. Some people who post about solo diving on ScubaBoard worry me ... because reading their posts clearly indicates that they're in no way prepared to deal with the risks involved. Unfortunately, much the same can be said about buddy diving. And diving in a pack introduces yet additional risks ... because nobody really has a buddy, and often the entire group is depending on a dive professional to "keep them safe". We see posts about bad experiences with dive guides all the time here. Why are those people depending on a dive guide? And what will they do if for some reason the dive guide is occupied helping another diver ... or they get separated from the group?
There shouldn't be any arguments about how "safe" it is to dive solo ... or with a buddy ... or in a group. The discussion should center around what the potential risks are, and what you should do to prepare for dealing with them if they should occur.
"Safe" isn't a matter of how you choose to dive ... it's a matter of how well you prepare for your dive ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)