I just got OW certified in april and AOW last week. I . . . don't plan on ever using my dive training to make a living. I . . . love to get into the meat of what I am into and want to know as much as i can about diving. . . . I don't know whether I should go for a master diver certification or dive master certification. . . . the dive shop offers master diver certification for $2500. it includes AOW, rescue, emergency, five specialties, three boat charters and/or springs entrance fees, and the application. Is this a reasonable price?
I love reading posts from newer divers, who show the kind of enthusiasm you clearly exhibited in your comments. May that enthusiasm 'live long and prosper'! Mine has, and I only wish I started diving as a young person.
The path to becoming a 'serious' diver - not a dive professional, rather someone who takes diving seriously, who enjoys continually improving their skills, who establishes personal standards, and sets personal goals, for themselves, and who sees
every dive as an opportunity to learn something new - is not exclusively based on taking more classes. Think of courses you have taken in your accounting curriculum that were, if not a waste of time, merely 'tastefully' understated' in content and value. NOR is becoming a serious diver exclusively based on diving more - if you learned bad habits in OW, or AOW (not saying you did, BTW), one thing you may well do by simply diving more is reinforce those bad habits, through diving more. Or, if you didn't learn something in OW, or AOW, there is no reason to believe that the learning will spontaneously occur simply by diving more - an intellectual 'immaculate conception' is not a predictable outcome of 'diving more'. What additional training will do is expand your vision and awareness of how much (more) there is to learn, and additional diving will expand your confidence, which allows you to focus more on extending your skills as basic diving becomes second nature - basic diving becomes a program running in the background, while your primary processor is running programs involving new skill development.
Master Scuba Diver vs DM
I completed the requirements for Master Scuba Diver, but I did so as something of a speed competition with my dive buddy. I learned something from each of the specialties I completed, but that had nothing to do with submitting paperwork for the Master Scuba Diver designation, although I accrued some personal satisfaction from winning the competition. I do, nonetheless, endorse the concept of taking additional specialty courses, because you can often learn specific skills / techniques / procedures more efficiently in a focused class than on your own. I took Divemaster to improve my personal dive skills - I had NO INTENTION of ever working as a dive professional (I, too, never wanted to use my dive training to make a living, and I am proud to say I have been conspicuously successful in reaching that goal) - and DM did help me do just that. So, I see DM as a possible course both for the diver who wants to work / teach in the recreational diving industry, as well as for divers who don't. But, I will also say that as an accidental instructor - something I never really planned on, it just worked out that way - I have learned an enormous amount from teaching as well. While completing DM, I also completed tec training. And, that was possibly the single most beneficial coursework I have ever completed. All roads may not lead to Rome, but there are many, different roads that do.
Packaged education
I am somewhat skeptical of the value of packages such as you describe. Frankly, I think $2500 sounds like a lot of money for what appears to be included. But, I don't have first hand knowledge of the operation, or the instructional staff, so the value may well be there. Before going down that path, I would want to ask A LOT of very detailed questions, about what specialties would be included, about what skills would be acquired, about what unique value you would accrue from that particular package, that you could not get through training elsewhere, or through pursuit of individual specialties. I am not very big of agency-specific chest thumping, either. I have seen good, and bad, instruction across agencies. Just because the putative content of a course is good does not guarantee that the course will be valuable. It is still worth knowing something about the instructor(s), and even getting references from previous students. But, ultimately, in predicting the outcome of an educational process, two statistically significant independent variables are the motivation and the preparation of the leaner.