CAPTAIN SINBAD
Contributor
After Divemasters, the second group in the entire scuba industry that I feel the most sympathy for is the free-lance scuba instructor who teaches independently of shops. I am not talking about the “visiting” instructor who teaches at a shop for his cut but the totally independent instructor who is on his own. Some of the best instructors I had were in this category and what made them the best was the freedom to dictate their own pace and encourage their own gear preferences without enforced schedules and sales pressure etc.
I have also had some very good instructors who were shop affiliated but overall teaching process was cookie cutter one. Example:
When I was doing my drysuit course I was in a BCD because that is what the shop had in its rental inventory. My drysuit instructor told me that this is not the best for drysuit and I should actually be diving in a back-plate and wing. She also told me not to mention this to the LDS owner because they do not sell BP-wings and she did not want to look like she was advertising things outside of what the shop sold. So, I finished the course in a jacket BCD which my instructor and I both felt was not the most optimum set up. I ended up purchasing the wing over internet because the LDS believed it was “Technical diving” gear. This is an example of a great instructor crippled by shop enforced rules.
I was wondering what can the industry do to assist free-lance scuba instructors who break away from shops? So far the trend is to discourage or punish instructors breaking away from a shop. Many certification agencies (SSI and SDI) state that in order to become an instructor you have to be affiliated with a shop which should have compressor and carry at least three major brands. Most basement instructors cant do that.
There are a few independent instructors in my area but the LDS would not even rent them four tanks to train their class. The LDS sees them as competition and will restrict them in anyway it can. Agencies do not want them to exist and insurance is high as well plus they have to invest in a small rental inventory (possibly a compressor) to be in business.
I was wondering what can we do to help this guy. LDS is in trouble anyway due to internet sale. The only thing in the entire LDS that internet can not deliver is this guy. In order to save him, do we really need to save the LDS? A few rescue ideas come to mind and I would like to hear comments on the benefit and feasibility of each:
Manufacturers like Hog, Dive Rite could adopt instructors in different areas in order to liberate them from the (middleman) shop. That way that instructor will also be the sales person / distributor for that brand. A part of me says this is the problem we are trying to run away from in the first place as we are trying to create a teaching environment free of market pressures. Yet becoming a slave to the manufacturer may actually be could be more liberating for the instructor than becoming a slave to the middle-man. If instructor can create future customers in the area without being affiliated with the shop then the brand should back him up.
An association of free-lance instructors which will collectively purchase teaching gear for all member instructors at a discounted price. It can also help with other things like setting up local support chapters that offer airfills / compressor services and assist in advertising and promotions.
In the end, LDS is already in trouble. If internet sales could meet free-lance instructor outside somewhere in a back alley or in someone’s basement then we may have a business model that is more sustainable than the strictly structured “shop.”
There are agencies that have achieved something similar to the above. GUE and UTD support freelance instructors and have been able to establish graduating standards that are higher than the agencies that sponsor “resorts” in the Caribbean. They also sell gear (GUE promotes Halcyon and UTD has its own brand). I am unsure what kind of benefit this will have for the instructor who is teaches through them. Do UTD instructors get UTD branded inventory at a reduced rate? Don’t know.
I am just thinking loud so any ideas, thoughts, suggestions welcome.
I have also had some very good instructors who were shop affiliated but overall teaching process was cookie cutter one. Example:
When I was doing my drysuit course I was in a BCD because that is what the shop had in its rental inventory. My drysuit instructor told me that this is not the best for drysuit and I should actually be diving in a back-plate and wing. She also told me not to mention this to the LDS owner because they do not sell BP-wings and she did not want to look like she was advertising things outside of what the shop sold. So, I finished the course in a jacket BCD which my instructor and I both felt was not the most optimum set up. I ended up purchasing the wing over internet because the LDS believed it was “Technical diving” gear. This is an example of a great instructor crippled by shop enforced rules.
I was wondering what can the industry do to assist free-lance scuba instructors who break away from shops? So far the trend is to discourage or punish instructors breaking away from a shop. Many certification agencies (SSI and SDI) state that in order to become an instructor you have to be affiliated with a shop which should have compressor and carry at least three major brands. Most basement instructors cant do that.
There are a few independent instructors in my area but the LDS would not even rent them four tanks to train their class. The LDS sees them as competition and will restrict them in anyway it can. Agencies do not want them to exist and insurance is high as well plus they have to invest in a small rental inventory (possibly a compressor) to be in business.
I was wondering what can we do to help this guy. LDS is in trouble anyway due to internet sale. The only thing in the entire LDS that internet can not deliver is this guy. In order to save him, do we really need to save the LDS? A few rescue ideas come to mind and I would like to hear comments on the benefit and feasibility of each:
Manufacturers like Hog, Dive Rite could adopt instructors in different areas in order to liberate them from the (middleman) shop. That way that instructor will also be the sales person / distributor for that brand. A part of me says this is the problem we are trying to run away from in the first place as we are trying to create a teaching environment free of market pressures. Yet becoming a slave to the manufacturer may actually be could be more liberating for the instructor than becoming a slave to the middle-man. If instructor can create future customers in the area without being affiliated with the shop then the brand should back him up.
An association of free-lance instructors which will collectively purchase teaching gear for all member instructors at a discounted price. It can also help with other things like setting up local support chapters that offer airfills / compressor services and assist in advertising and promotions.
In the end, LDS is already in trouble. If internet sales could meet free-lance instructor outside somewhere in a back alley or in someone’s basement then we may have a business model that is more sustainable than the strictly structured “shop.”
There are agencies that have achieved something similar to the above. GUE and UTD support freelance instructors and have been able to establish graduating standards that are higher than the agencies that sponsor “resorts” in the Caribbean. They also sell gear (GUE promotes Halcyon and UTD has its own brand). I am unsure what kind of benefit this will have for the instructor who is teaches through them. Do UTD instructors get UTD branded inventory at a reduced rate? Don’t know.
I am just thinking loud so any ideas, thoughts, suggestions welcome.
Last edited: