mattiedread
Guest
Dived is only correctly used as particple, meaning in conjunction with the verbs to be, to have and to do... There may be other applications that are grammatically correct that I currently can't recall.
"I have dived there before." "I would have dived there, but my damned mother-in-law showed up for a 'surprise' visit."
I'm no English major and I spell as well as my 4 year old (who is a Labrador mutt); so I speak not the truth but merely what I believe the truth to be as beaten into me by nuns, priests and Irish Christian Brothers. (Love knows no boundries).
I watched the testimony of a 13 year old being tried as an adult for Murder One in Florida today and there are so many things alarming about this prosecution. One of them, the prosecution's grammar is deplorable. If I were on the jury I'd be tempted to acquit on the lack of couth of the prosecutor as opposed to the facts. (I wouldn't, it would be an ethical violation of my responsibilities as a juror, but, jurries notoriously convict/acquit for reasons unrelated to the crime/case).
I guess some of those beatings had a positive effect.
"I have dived there before." "I would have dived there, but my damned mother-in-law showed up for a 'surprise' visit."
I'm no English major and I spell as well as my 4 year old (who is a Labrador mutt); so I speak not the truth but merely what I believe the truth to be as beaten into me by nuns, priests and Irish Christian Brothers. (Love knows no boundries).
I watched the testimony of a 13 year old being tried as an adult for Murder One in Florida today and there are so many things alarming about this prosecution. One of them, the prosecution's grammar is deplorable. If I were on the jury I'd be tempted to acquit on the lack of couth of the prosecutor as opposed to the facts. (I wouldn't, it would be an ethical violation of my responsibilities as a juror, but, jurries notoriously convict/acquit for reasons unrelated to the crime/case).
I guess some of those beatings had a positive effect.