GrumpyOldGuy
Contributor
1.4 isn't all that conservative. If your "out of air" problem happens when you've been swimming into the current for a few minutes and are breathing pretty hard right before the added "excitement" of discovering you have no air, even 2.0 is not excessive.
Also, there are a number of possible first stage failures that cause an immediate and unexpected loss of all gas without warning, including a clogged dip tube, a clogged first stage inlet filter and on rare occasions, an exploding first stage (SCUBAPro Mk 10, I believe).
flots.
So are you trying to say I need 3.5X of normal SAC to deal with an OOG situation? I find that humorous, along with preparing for an exploding 1st stage. Possible, but as likely as being dinner for a roaming great white shark. Most likely when I do need it, if ever it will most likely be one of those 1:1000 things like a blown 0-Ring, failed LP hose or free flow.
What I am saying is allow for a reasonable multiplier to account for stress. 2.0 is a standard many people use, I feel for me 1.75 is enough for me. That's based on my regularly drilling with my pony and being extremely comfortable in the water. When doing these math exercises, people sometimes take the worst case scenario from every level (excess time at depth solving a problem, very high SAC) and then compound them by requiring best ascent practices (slow ascent and execution of optional safety stops). If that is the model you want to use, then slinging a 30 or larger is your tool of choice. My model is swap regs and swim up to safety stop. Then assess. When I see that I only need 1/4 of a 13cf bottle when drilling for this, then I am pretty confident a full 13cf will get the job done.