RonFrank:
You seem to be lacking in understanding how flash TTL works.
There is no photo eye on the outside of the body.. at all. Where do you get this information? iTTL uses a 256 segment meter that reads light off the sensor plane to judge exposure. In addition iTTL uses something like up to nine pre-flashes to determine accurate exposure when doing flash.
PnS camera's while maybe not as advanced as Nikon's iTTL also use sensors at the focal plane and preflash to determine the flash exposure.
More than you think Ron, more than you think... eyebrow
There is a photo eye in the poster's camera (see picture below) its in the 2 oclock position above the lens. In this case they should call it TTTL or Through The "Top" of the Lens.
http://www.nikonians.org/dcforum/DCForumID86/668.html
Because, Ron, why do you think Nikon has to fire a series of preflashes in order to make the iTTL work? And that is before the mirror is lifted in a DSLR, so the photo sensor cannot be reading off the CCD sensor (as in film) because the mirror is still in the way!
A true TTL system as we know it with film, has a sensor reading the light bouncing off the film in real time then turning off the strobe.
The iTTL does not do this, it has to fire a series of flash in order to gauge the correct amount of flash needed before the light even hits the CCD sensor.
Actually my Nikon Rep. told me the same thing:
"No, this is not red-eye reduction or low light AF assist. iTTL is a replacement mechanism for how film cameras read the light level off the film. Since the sensors in DSLRs do not reflect light like film does, the camera is unable to read the light level from the sensor directly. Therefore, the solution that Nikon came up with is to fire pre-flashes, read the results of those pre-flashes, then fire the flash and take the picture. If you are familiar with control system theory, one would consider the method used by film cameras to be closed-loop since it is reading the actual light level from the film prior while taking the picture and iTTL open-loop since all calcuations are done prior to taking the picture. The thought is that since so little time has passed since you did the pre-flash calculation, the light levels in the area are likely the same and your pre-caculated guess will yield a good result.
This is all well and good, except that the camera leaves the mirror down during the pre-flash period. It takes noticable time to raise that mirror, causing a brief, but noticable, delay. Coupled with the percieved brightness of the pre-flash, some people consistantly blink during the pre-flash and the main flash catches them with their eyes closed."
and another:
"Digital came later with sensors which reflect very little light and conventional mirror box sensors had big trouble. Exposure adjustment during exposure was dropped because it was not accurate in a short enough time with the low reflectance levels."
Anyone in the Nikon Club should have known about this a long time ago.