These people are guides. That loose groups of holiday divers put their safety in their hands is a mistake for everyone.
In the recent case it sounds like the guide was put in a difficult position, presumably considering a duty to the group over the one to the diver with an issue. How is one person supposed to cope in those circumstances? If they believe (through experience or what they get told) that the group is so incompetent as to be at risk without a guide then they will want to stick with the group.
Divers ought to be self sufficient in the conditions they dive in. Not just the diver surfacing alone but the group left behind. The guide ought to be able to assume he can ignore most of them and pay attention to the one with an issue.
That they are thought of as a group rather than a collection of buddy pairs is telling.
People ought not to be doing dives with a guide they would not be prepared to do as part of a buddy pair. Perhaps Carverns are an exception.
In the recent case it sounds like the guide was put in a difficult position, presumably considering a duty to the group over the one to the diver with an issue. How is one person supposed to cope in those circumstances? If they believe (through experience or what they get told) that the group is so incompetent as to be at risk without a guide then they will want to stick with the group.
Divers ought to be self sufficient in the conditions they dive in. Not just the diver surfacing alone but the group left behind. The guide ought to be able to assume he can ignore most of them and pay attention to the one with an issue.
That they are thought of as a group rather than a collection of buddy pairs is telling.
People ought not to be doing dives with a guide they would not be prepared to do as part of a buddy pair. Perhaps Carverns are an exception.
Last edited: