I'll believe the helmet BS when I see riders wearing blaze orange rather than black leather or denim. Situational awareness cuts both ways.
.
Indeed it does, but it is immaterial to the question of if not having a helmet increases the ability of the rider to be aware of impending dangers sooner and thus increase their ability to avoid them altogether (or at least minimize their impact).
When I rode, I doubled up the lights on the back of the bike, wore a blaze orange riding vest (a military requirement on post, and since I was almost alway going to or from post, it was just something I always wore, even around town). And yet I went down 3 times, none of which were my fault. I faced a drunk crossing into my lane once, an oblivious twit merging into my lane forcing me into a median barrier in a construction zone, and an old lady pulling out in front of me and stopping in the middle of the road.
In none of those cases do I believe I would have been aware of the danger more readily without a helmet. Two were directly in front of me, and I knew the guy on the side was coming over, but I couldn't speed past him due to traffic/construction and I did brake hard, but it wasn't sufficient to avoid impact (though it did significantly minimize injury).
But something that isn't considered in the hypothesis that the lack of a helmet increases SA is the question of if someone not wearing a helmet tends to drive more conservatively than someone who is not. If that is the case, then it is not the helmet that reduces situational awareness, but the awareness of the threat imposed by not wearing a helmet that matters.
I forget who mentioned it, but I heard someone suggest that the way to eliminate meaning auto accidents is to require all vehicles not have seat belts and have a razor sharp spike that sticks out of the steering wheel and points directly at the driver's heart. It is pretty well guaranteed that accidents would go down.
And this circles back to scuba in this way -- conservative diving increases with perception of increased risk. Does that mean instructors should scare students? Of course not. But we do have an obligation to inform students of the need for continual skill refinement and situational awareness with regards to all of the variables they can control.
There is no down side to continually emphasizing dive planning, adherence to the plan, and so on. The question is how many students will actually do those things?