Decompression algorithm choice

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

SSpiffy

Contributor
Messages
72
Reaction score
21
Location
Puget Sound
# of dives
I just don't log dives
I just bought a VT-4.0; my usual dive buddy uses an Atomic Cobalt with their exclusive algorithm. Which decompression algorithm setting (PELAGIC DSAT* or PELAGIC Z+) would be a better starting point to get our dive profiles in sync?
 
I compared the NDLs on his Atomic Cobalt with conservatism cranked to 11 to the four possible models on the Oceanic VT-4.0. The model that most closely matched his was the PZ+ without conservatism turned on. As someone in the thread in the Atomic forum suggested, they were most divergent at shallow depths.

Here's an Excel spreadsheet with the data on it.
 

Attachments

  • Decompression.xls
    27.5 KB · Views: 44
I'm not at all surprised that the closest match was PZ+ without conservatism. The DSAT alogrithm is more liberal. It will be interesting to see how the closest match performs over repetitive dives. Only your diving experience will tell, I hope you will post your experience.

Good diving, Craig
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom