dive computers and reverse profiles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Much bigger difference here

Yeah... on their original plot both ZH-L@10/100 and Fused RGBM got the diver out of the water at around 1:20, while you have 1:40. So much for their infografic. But anyway, now it looks like they turned the knobs a bit too much and their deep stops are now shallower, and the shallow ones are longer, than the competition. Gotta wonder how many goats died for that profile.
 
Yeah... on their original plot both ZH-L@10/100 and Fused RGBM got the diver out of the water at around 1:20, while you have 1:40. So much for their infografic. But anyway, now it looks like they turned the knobs a bit too much and their deep stops are now shallower, and the shallow ones are longer, than the competition. Gotta wonder how many goats died for that profile.
Are you referring to the 10/100, 20/80, and fused rgbm plot on page 7?

That was to 80m and presumably not on air.

Different that the Fused RGBM 2 plots on the past two pages that I made.
 
Are you referring to the 10/100, 20/80, and fused rgbm plot on page 7?

Yes, I meant comparing Fused 2 to Fused no-number -- or to ZH-L16@10/100 as a proxy for the latter (but then you'd have to use the dive from page 7 as we have no idea how 10/100 matches to Fused-no-number on any other profile).
 
Yes, I meant comparing Fused 2 to Fused no-number -- or to ZH-L16@10/100 as a proxy for the latter (but then you'd have to use the dive from page 7 as we have no idea how 10/100 matches to Fused-no-number on any other profile).
I'm a bit hesitant to try to make a direct comparison to the infographic they provided, as I don't know what parameters, what gasses, if the different algorithms somehow treat that differently, etc.

It is interesting to see that the fused rgbm 2 is fairly similar, at least on that one made up dive profile, to the 68/82 numbers.
 

Back
Top Bottom