Let me see if I have this right. . .the Ecuadoran government took away the dive permits and gave them to fisherman. Seems like a wise choice. Take the permits from the low impact commercial nature lovers and give them to the high impact commercial fishing industry which will go to work destroying the very thing that makes the Galapagos unique in the world. If I didn't know better I would think that decision came out of the Bush administration.
Yes, you're right, it probably did come from
Capitalist thinking, not Socialism.
Remember the plan here is to allow the Fishermen to
sell their permits to the liveaboard trade. Think about it.
Step back and think about it. If the Government is trying to protect thi$ re$ource and yet
at the $ame time not rob e$tablished livelihood$ from the fishermen, why not sell the licenses to the fisherman? Then they are free to resell. If the dive industry is so strong so as
to support this nicety of a Marine Reserve, the market price for such licenses will dictate that... yes or no.
If a liveaboard charges enough to take our pasty white selves off to look at the critters, then they will be able to afford to buy the licenses from the fishermen. Capitalism, pure and simple.
The market shall dictate the price structure as well as the viability of the desires of both sides. Similar to enforcing
our Socialist bent views on South America and strong arming them into not clear-cutting old growth and "Rain Forest" (formerly known as "jungle") trees you see. A lot of locals down there want satellite TV and Toyotas, yet
we are ready to tell them that they should "stay down" so we can enjoy their
priceless world heritage biosphere.
No,
everything has a price. A guy whose family is living in a dirt floor shack doesn't have the need for Al Gore to tell him what he doesn't need to sell. Right now, he needs money, the environment? That concern is for the wealthy. Thus....
You can have whatever you are willing to pay for.
So kids, whadya think? After all the dust settles, Liveaboard prices will be
going down?
Scott&Sara:
waterbaby09... learn the facts prior to posting.
All sorts of people post things for all sorts of reasons, sometimes it's factual error, sometimes it gets into other realms. We are dealing with an issue here that we look at as an emotional highly charged
environmental debate, the ones who will decide the outcome are seeing $$$ signs and the internet as a useful tool to bend public opinion.
Scott&Sara:
I just returned from there three weeks ago and I can say that a true live-aboards is the only way to go
My experience is nowhere near that recent, but I base my
land based recommendation on many vsits to the Galloping Pogos, most of them were on liveaboards. You can have them. I realize that SCUBA Magazines don't feature land based~ because liveaboards buy the ads, but maybe we have been reading the wrong dive magazines, eh?
Scott&Sara:
It does not however discuss land based operations so I do not have an answer for that
They are operational, at 1/3 to 1/4 the cost.
:arrow:
Here is our trip report:
Myspace.com Blogs:148905954 MySpace Blog