Aqua Buoy
Contributor
fishoutawater:Very true Aqua Bouy. Although, like myself, most people get into this sport because of their love for marine life. Likewise, I did notice a marked lack of urchins in the Carribean when I first dove it as compared to southern California.
Similarly a DM's attitude probably reflects his own upbringing.
A few years ago, I moved to a small river town and befriended a few local boys. These guys grew up in this area as hunters and fishermen. As such, I would've expected them to have a certain level of respect for their surroundings. I was wrong. When they go out in the woods, it's always to kill something. If it moves, they kill it, whether they plan on eating it or not, no matter what it is. I'm different. I don't shoot it unless it's in season. I don't kill it if it's pregnant. And I don't kill it if I have no plans to eat it. As a matter of fact, I haven't hunted since I bought my property, just because I have a ready supply of meat at the grocery. I like my critters crawling, walking, or flying, not on my wall or in my freezer. One of those guys recently approached me about hunting on my land, because I made the mistake of telling him I have more turkey and deer than I could shake a stick at. I asked him why he don't hunt on his farm. He said it's because he doesn't have any game on his land. I said, "And you wonder why"?
In Cozumel, I noticed a lot of nice coral, but not many fish. The local DMs are just like the good 'ol boys around my little town. The see it, they kill it. They grew up that way. They do the DM thing, not for a love of their environment, they just do it for the money.
Makes it REAL hard for me to shell out a tip after a dive.
I agree with you though, an understanding of the environment should be taught along with bubble blowing 101.
I completely agree with you on that, I know some of the local DMs here on the island (and there aren't many) have been caught riding sea turtles or doing similar things, though I must say it isn't prevalent, it is because of a completely different worldview and a percieved need to make money. And while I don't agree with the method, these guys do need money, but they're going about it the wrong way. The trouble is the some of the shops used to allow it (or at least not doing anything significant about it), I know most places would have DMs seriously reprimanded (firing being a bit harder as they need them!) if they caught turtles being ridden, or something similar.
As for Vickie's comments, I agree, no diver is perfect and I also agree that many new divers (which we all were at some point) can do a lot of damage, no arguing there - I've done my share of mistakes. Though the debate I am going on about is about DMs that are known/observed to do things on purpose and those actions being questionable. Having said that, I'm about to address the bit on marine biologists.
About the marine biologists, there are those that believe they can do whatever they want and rules don't apply to them, and I can see where they're coming from. While I am not familiar with Dion's case, it is sometimes hard to distinguish between good and bad practice if one doesn't really know what they're doing (obviously if they're doing a survey standing on the coral that's different, as per my example earlier). Now if say we had professionals underwater, first I find it bad practice to have them doing their thing (even marine biologists on holidays retain they inquisitveness!) in front of others as they've been taught "don't touch anything, ever" but here come a bunch of "pros" and start playing around.
It could well be they did/mean no harm, but I think it's bad practice to do in from of others, at the very very least they should have talked to the shop/DM and told them what they'd be up to so others could be briefed and said - well here are some marine biologists, they're going to be doing some things they know about and they know what they're doing (hopefully!) and please do not do what they do. Maybe afterwards they might even exchange some "findings" with the customers. But as I said before, many biological investigations are by their very nature destructive (hence the term "destructive sampling"). Again, I can't comment on the case in point as I wasn't present.
Now, if we consider DMs picking up sharks versus the actions of a travel diver (which I believe is the point Fishoutawate was trying to make) is that if we really really cared that much about the environment we wouldn't either a) travel to dive (or travel at all) or b) not dive at all. I think it is fair to accept that air travel is becoming one of the biggest contributors of global warming (I know the US gov't is a tad in denial about the whole thing, but that's a debate for elsewhere), so travelling to Aruba, Cozumel, Grenada, Yap or Zanzibar divers wrack up scary amounts of carbon miles to start with. But not because we wrack up pollution on the way to the dive site does it mean it's ok to step on a coral or two or stand by and watch local DMs messing around unnecessarily with wildlife. (though it would be nice to see some alternate ways to travel!) Same thing about point B, the environmentally ideal thing to do would be not to dive, but we still do but don't (at least I hope not) use it an excuse to trash the place or take a "souvenir" home with us.
I'm a conservationist and not a preservationist, I think all things can be approached with common sense, but it doesn't mean it always is.