elan
Contributor
I do not think PADI is totally wrong when you use the dry suit "for buoyancy" with the trilam/crashed neoprene. At least in recreational department. Buoyancy compensation is required for the 1. air lose 2. suit buoyancy lose. the second is not existent with the thin dry suits as you adjust the volume of the suit with the depth. the first one depends upon how much air you consume. If you consume something in a range of 3-4lb of air which equals to 50-60 cuf some can compensate it easily with lungs. So you are 2 lb overweight with in the start of the dive and underweight 2lb at the end. So technically in this case you do not even have to touch the BCD button. So if you are properly weighted you should have no bubble to manage. So what they teach is correct with the above mentioned suits.
Thicker suits like 4 and 7 mill will lose buoyancy themselves so compensation for that would form a bubble in the suit and is better managed with BC imho.
"Eliminating the squeeze" is not technically correct. If you dive cold water the undergarments will stop to work properly long before you feel any squeeze, at least mine do.
Diving double tanks with stages is a different animal and if I read it right PADI mentioned that
Thicker suits like 4 and 7 mill will lose buoyancy themselves so compensation for that would form a bubble in the suit and is better managed with BC imho.
"Eliminating the squeeze" is not technically correct. If you dive cold water the undergarments will stop to work properly long before you feel any squeeze, at least mine do.
Diving double tanks with stages is a different animal and if I read it right PADI mentioned that