fisherdvm
Contributor
- Messages
- 3,577
- Reaction score
- 52
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
Salmon farming is a fairly new industry and therefore hasn't as much time to get into habits that have been learned for hundreds of years. Some habits are hard to break. It is highly regulated, and science is the way it started. Check it out for yourself, the aquaculture act in British Columbia will blow your mind.
Feel free to ask any other questions...
I think we have hijacked this thread...maybe this discussion deserves its own?
Cheers
O
Yes, we probably need a new thread. I was quite amazed at the salmon food conversion rate, better than poultry, which I thought was the best. I mean 1.35 lbs of food for 1 lb of meat? Almost impossible to believe.
But the bottom line concern is - damage to the environment. Salmon farms have to be built in sheltered cove, to protect from storm, surges, etc.
Second, they need a good flow of water, to carry away waste.
Where does the waste go? Into bays and sheltered rivers.
What does the waste do to the local ecology? That is my biggest concern, and others too. It doesn't take very much waste to cause algae bloom, bacterial overgrowth, and other problems. 2 tons of salmon, equals 2 tons of waste or more (if wet). Not simply 1.35 minus 1 - as feed to meat ratio is dry weight of food to wet weight of meat.
I think you, and any others, will have a very hard time convincing me of the small environmental foot print of salmon aquaculture. It will take alot of convincing. But if one can raise prawn and shrimps in the middle of Michigan (but shrimp is a high priced commodity), one can possibly farm salmon safely inland. I just can't see farming salmon in open water good for the environment.