I'm diving the Oriskany next week. I'll be diving OC. My buddy will be diving a CCR.
I'm only trained to carry 1 deco cylinder and plan to adhere to my training.
My training for planning is based on having a buddy that is also diving OC. Per that training, I would plan my deco gas cylinder so that my and my buddy's requirements are each less than half the size of the deco cylinder I'm carrying. So, if my buddy loses his deco gas, we can share mine and have enough for both of us. We would both be carrying twice as much as either of us would need.
Similarly, my rock bottom calculation is based on getting 2 divers from the furthest point in the dive to the first gas switch.
Since my buddy will actually be on a CCR and will be carrying BO cylinders of bottom gas and deco gas that will be sufficient to get him safely from the furthest point in the dive to the surface in the event he has a CCR failure, my thinking is that I do not need to reserve any of the gas I'm carrying for him. But, I can plan to use his, if needed.
So, my rock bottom planning would be for 1 diver, instead of the usual 2. And I can plan that if I have any lost gas, I can use one of his BO cylinders.
This thinking is all based on the usual approach of only planning for 1 failure. But, I don't know if that's valid when you're talking about a CCR diver. Is it? Is it acceptable to plan that if I lost my deco gas, I can just take the deco gas cylinder my CCR buddy is carrying? Is it acceptable to plan that if I somehow lose all my back gas, I can take the bottom gas BO cylinder my buddy is carrying?
Or does diving with a CCR have elevated risk such that a CCR diver would/should never dive with a plan that includes him having to donate one of his BO cylinders to someone else?
I will discuss all this with my buddy, of course. But, I want other opinions just to reassure me that if he says this is an acceptable plan, there is no part of his acceptance that is based on a feeling of pressure from me or a willingness to compromise on safety to get decent bottom time when he's handicapped by diving with an OC diver. I don't believe he would do any of that. I'm just paranoid and like to get other perspectives on the relative safety of what I'm proposing.
I'm only trained to carry 1 deco cylinder and plan to adhere to my training.
My training for planning is based on having a buddy that is also diving OC. Per that training, I would plan my deco gas cylinder so that my and my buddy's requirements are each less than half the size of the deco cylinder I'm carrying. So, if my buddy loses his deco gas, we can share mine and have enough for both of us. We would both be carrying twice as much as either of us would need.
Similarly, my rock bottom calculation is based on getting 2 divers from the furthest point in the dive to the first gas switch.
Since my buddy will actually be on a CCR and will be carrying BO cylinders of bottom gas and deco gas that will be sufficient to get him safely from the furthest point in the dive to the surface in the event he has a CCR failure, my thinking is that I do not need to reserve any of the gas I'm carrying for him. But, I can plan to use his, if needed.
So, my rock bottom planning would be for 1 diver, instead of the usual 2. And I can plan that if I have any lost gas, I can use one of his BO cylinders.
This thinking is all based on the usual approach of only planning for 1 failure. But, I don't know if that's valid when you're talking about a CCR diver. Is it? Is it acceptable to plan that if I lost my deco gas, I can just take the deco gas cylinder my CCR buddy is carrying? Is it acceptable to plan that if I somehow lose all my back gas, I can take the bottom gas BO cylinder my buddy is carrying?
Or does diving with a CCR have elevated risk such that a CCR diver would/should never dive with a plan that includes him having to donate one of his BO cylinders to someone else?
I will discuss all this with my buddy, of course. But, I want other opinions just to reassure me that if he says this is an acceptable plan, there is no part of his acceptance that is based on a feeling of pressure from me or a willingness to compromise on safety to get decent bottom time when he's handicapped by diving with an OC diver. I don't believe he would do any of that. I'm just paranoid and like to get other perspectives on the relative safety of what I'm proposing.