jkennedy:
Great points Rick. The whole time I was reading this thread you were the first to mention "IN" sourcing.(Honda,Mercedes,and etc.) If all the jobs are in Mexico why are the Mexicans coming here and finding a job in ten minutes.
First off, not all the jobs are in mexico but manufacturing is NOT in good shape in this country.
Second, have you ever spent much time in any of the border towns where so many of the manufacturing plants are located? I have and I can tell you that they aren't nice places. I can't imagine any one wanting to live there if they have a chance to come here.
To set around and blame goverment is not American and LAZY.
I don't know that I've noticed any one here blaming the government. I do know alot about the mismanagement I've seen in these plants that I've moved south (this is the third).
I'm not sure who you're calling lazy either. Myself, I've been working since I was 15 and doctored my birth certificate so I could get a job. I've started 2 different businesses and worked myself through school while raising a family. School that I have 4 more years of payments on BTW. Since closing the dive shop last year I went back to shoeing horses on the side so I still work evenings and weekends. Lazy? Nobody by that name around here.
I have lost my job and picked my *** up and found a bigger and better one.
Finding a job is one thing. However, if you have to sell your house and move enough times you eventually find yourself losing your job when you are at an age where no one wants you and you have nothing but a huge mortgage.
It's out there. Only 5.4% of the workers in this country are not working. 94.6% are WORKING.
Somewhat deceptive figures unless you show a pay/benefite distribution along with the 94%.
5 per cent of the people in our great country wouldn't work if you gave them a job.
Yes and I say that if one chooses not to work we should let them starve rather than give them a free ride.
So where are YOU that complain?
That's easy to answer. I'm working on moving my third manufacturing facility to Mexico. I have been doing this for 15 years and have no pension or seniority. I've watched manufacturing and business management change over the years. We used to have a few VP's who understood manufacturing and impressed you with their talent. Now days it's hard to even find some one who knows what you're talking about. Now we have organizations that are so top heavy that every project meeting I'm in has way more "managers" than working people. 3 people do the work and like 30 manage it. LOL. High payed people I might add. How many engineers does it take to put in a light bulb? Never mind. How much does it cost to create a timing chart and power point presentation that would be funny if we didn't have to spend so many hours explaing why it's all wrong and fixing it?
When the cost becomes too much of a burden they move the manufacturing part of the oporation to Mexico so they can keep paying the managers. LOL. Shoot... we see managers with strange titles that make it impossible to even figure out what they're supposed to be doing. They use consulting firms to tell them how to find the rest room.
BTW, what percentage of the cost burden does this highy paid indirect labor represent? I can tell you this, that the direct labor portion of most of the products that I've moved to mexico was less than 10% and I'll bet there were products where it was closer to 1%. Now, the math is simple. If you reduce that small percentage (direct labor) by a large percentage, you didn't save very much. If you keep all that expensive indirect labor and buy them new homes in the area where they want to set up shop you won't save a thing even if you save as much on direct labor as you claimed that you would...which you won't. The 1, 2 or 3 year payback you promised on the move will turn into a 10 year payback or longer...if you really save anything.
The high level managers and consultants who sold the original fantasy will be well on their way to destroying another company (maybe their 2nd or 3rd)before any one ever realizes they were full of it.
I've seen it. Automotive switches in Winamac In. Labor content average 10%. Operator salery $10/hour...Mexican labor at the time was $1/hour. Labor copntent of the switches built there...10%...just like in Winamac. Consider the promotions given to those who carried out a wonderful move and the savings is ZIP. Those who did it pat themselves on the back and move on to do it someplace else. LOL Shoot they spent more on flying me back and forth than they could ever save. Management does throw some big parties in Brownsville during the move when all their buds are down there with them though. Some one with third grade math skills could see what's going on here.
There are products where low cost labor makes sense. Short lived products with high labor content and low skill requirements = go for the cheap labor. However, you won't make money by moving them because they won't be around long enough to pay for the move. The stock holders will have to pay the consultants bill out of their own pocket. You have to put them in the right place from the start and the process begines with product inception and the design. you design it for how you are going to build it. When you concieve a product that no onew will want, design it so it's almost impossible to build, have huge indirect costs (your buds with titles that don't mean anything who make power point shows for a living) and then decide that you're in financial trouble you won't make money by running for the border especially if you keep the buds with the funny titles.
Sorry, the big money is in burden (including indirect labor) and the biggie...material cost which is closely tied to the design. Chasing cheap assembly labor is a crutch of those who haven't a clue and they misuse even that.
Now, don't get me wrong. If a guy runs a business he can do whatever he wants with it. That doesn't mean it's smart. He can cover his tracks any way he wants but I saw him go so I don't need the tracks. LOL