Huh? If this report is taken at its word, how was this suit in any way frivolous? Paramedics DO NOT stop resuscitating victims, and the DO NOT have the authority to declare them dead (for the very reason that, as happened here, they get it wrong).
Actually, you are wrong in this case. I'm a career paramedic and it is within my protocol to cease resucitation in the field if I feel that the efforts are futile. We have a protocol that we have to follow in order to do so, but it can be done and is done more often than people realize. It's not uncommon for me to provide efforts for 20 minutes and then stop the efforts. The treatments provided prehospitally are the same as what is provided in hospital.
Now, from what little of the actual case is presented through this article I probably would not have ceased efforts. There are a few reasons for this.
First, the incident happened in a public place. It's a touchy situation when you withhold or cease efforts in public view.
Second, due to the victim's age they are probably a good candidate for possible organ donation.
Third, depending on water temperature they have an increased chance of survival. This is a unique case as opposed to someone involved in a car accident or a random medical event. As such, it should be treated differently.
So while I do agree that their deicision to cease efforts was not apporpriate in this case, it's also inapproriate to make a blanket statement about a profession which you seem to know little about. Few people know what it really takes to be a paramedic, and even fewer really know what a paramedic can and can't do. It's a problem even within healthcare of other providers not knowing what a paramedics limitations are (or aren't).
Shane
NREMT-Paramedic