You mean due to the AL80s' larger diameter I assume. I see from the
Scuba Cylinder Specification Chart from Huron Scuba, Ann Arbor Michigan that the 72 cu. ft. cylinders from back in the day are 6.9 inches in diameter. That means I'd have to be careful because most modern cylinders have a larger diameter. Good to know. Thanks for pointing out that.
Now that I think about it this brings me back to my original question. Given that most BCs produced in the past few years do work with larger diameter cylinders is it still reasonable to try to slice n' dice an existing older BC to extract the backpack and webbing? And if that might work do I need a size large (I'm 6 ft, 190 lbs, 44 inch chest, 38 inch waist) BC or could I deconstruct a size small or medium BC? In other words does the backpack component of modern BCs vary with regard to the size of the BC?
Good point. Today while snorkeling I experimented maintaining neutral buoyancy. I was diving in the Atlantic wearing a nylon bathing suit and rash guard shirt under my 3mm shorty wetsuit (a Deep See model with sleeves chopped at the bicep), a pair of ScubaPro Jet Fins large (the more buoyant model with the lightning on the label), a mask and snorkel, and a 7 pouch weight belt loaded with 4X3lb Sea Pearl lead pounches.
I attained neutral buoyancy by hanging vertically in the water, inhaling fully, and holding my breath. As long as I held my breath my head was just touching the water line and the top of my snorkel was above the water's surface. When I exhaled I sank to the bottom fairly quickly. The water was 10-12 feet deep so it didn't take long to touch bottom.
I concluded that I was neutrally bouyant with 12 lbs weighting. Is there something else I should consider to determine neutral buoyancy?