Most divers have gone to 15 or 20 foot stops. Ten foot stops are so "old school" and almost as old school as no stop. I would not worry over it
I agree. Ten foot stops are simply an annoyance in open ocean. Plus many people have been doing the 10 foot stop on 100%, so there is little benefit, compared with combining the times in a 20ft stop. The 20ft stop is just as effective, it is done below the 15 ft hang bar, below most of the swells, etc. The 20 ft stop is when most of us go to 100% anyway. Once am on 100%, I am not particularly concerned with additional ongassing.
nemrod:
Next week it will be 25 foot stops standing on your head with your toes at 19 feet and a half twist added in, frankly, I do not care what the latest flavor of stop is in vogue, I am still trying to figure out how to program my VCR, do I still even have a VCR, cannot keep up with it all.
I suspect it has less to do with what's I vogue, and more to do with what works, and is functional.
nemrod:
I wonder if it has to do with the lower fitness standards and overall obesity.
i doubt it has anything to do with fitness standards, or a specific scientific basis. It is just convenience. If a deco program shows me doing a 20 ft stop and a 10 ft stop on 100%, chances are I will combine them at 20 ft. In open ocean, the 20 ft stop makes sense. In other circumstances, the choice of a final depth depends on the environment. If I go to 40 Fathom, and there is a nice platform at 20 ft, where I can doze while doing my 20+ minute stop, without getting in someone's way, that's where I will do my deco. There's a 10 ft platform, too, but there is more traffic.
When a 10 ft stop might make more sense is when there is a limited gas supply concern.