IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME . oops that caps... we used the victoms bc but had to be prepared to use our own in event of a victom with mt air bottle syndrome. another thing is the vic is above you they wont try to climb down, if they are below you and you are pulling them up (in a rescue) you have a panic'd diver using you aor a ladder to the surface. since in my opinion ( in recovery) the vic is history and you are not doing life saving efforts. the rapid accent is then moot to the vic. and a key element is not to become a vic your self. if they are heavy dropping thier weights may resolve the heavyness of the vic. if this is a rescue then things change a bit as the survivability of the vic is now in play again. it is a waste to bring a vic up just to drop them. the vics vest will make that a successful recovery or rescue?? . the legal minds will probably say we can not assume the vic is (expired) and can not use them liks a fishing bobber or leave them with a surface bouy marker. i would argue with that depending what i found. lost honrymoon wife, spear fishing or cut hose (ACCIDENT?????) I WOULD LEAVE THEM AND MARK THE POSITION tide and current providing. then let the officials do an investigation with out a fouled scene.
Just about everything here appears correct. Any professional rescuer will tell you the absolute most critical part of any rescue is that your safety always always always comes first. Water rescues provide a very unique challenge to this unbending rule, and is really one of the reasons that I think that the rescue diver class for lay rescuers is a very poor and ultimately dangerous idea. Water rescues are extremely extremely dangerous, 100 times out of 100 a concious vic will climb up on top of you and proceed to drown you dead in order to say afloat, it is a simple reflex response, it happens every time. This is why it is so important to make sure you always approach your victim from behind, and if at depth, maintain your safe ascent as number one priority, and use their bc for buoyancy. The only difference between yourself and a panic stricken diver is the state of mind you carry with you as you enter the water.
couple things posted here that I wanted to add to. There is never gong to be a reason to do a pulse check for any drowning vic while in the water, and unless you are a first responder you should not waste time looking for a pulse regardless.
--2 out of 10 times that an average EMT during an actual emergency checks for a pulse on a victim they either miss a pulse that is present but maybe thready or hit a pulse that isn't there (generally their own thumb). Compressions must be done on a hard flat surface regardless and jsut as sure as i am that hte sun will rise tommorow i am sure that a unconcious vic with no breath sounds is seconds away from going pulseless.
the reason most unconcious vic's suffer pulmonary trauma during rescue is that even though they are unconcious, air is still unable to escape the lungs either at all or at a rate comprable to what is required during a controlled ascent. This is the exact same reason that those of you who have taken CPR have been taught how to do a head tilt chin lift manuever to check for breathing and give breaths, with the chin down to the chest, the tongue will settle in the throat and block the airway.
Uhh(unless I'm reading your gibberish post incorrectly), the "victim" is alive and well and able to be turned into a patient at the surface until a doctor(or someone suitably qualified and equipped) declares them dead.
Doing otherwise can run you quite afoul of numerous good Samaritan laws which demand you provide help unless specifically requested otherwise. The only things you'll need to answer are the facts that you saw, which was how you saw the person, what you did to bring them up, and what life saving measures you performed until EMS took over. Anything else is paranoid bull****, and doing otherwise will in fact leave you open to issues.
Just about every single thing you said here is incorrect. The only person legally allowed to declare someone dead outside of a hospital setting is the M.E. there are a few small exceptions such as a casae of traumatic decapitation etc. but everyone goes to the hospital dead or not.
You are excatly 100 percent mistaken regarding good sam. there is no duty to act for any layperson in any state in the US. THERE ARE A FEW PHRASES YOU SHOULD GET FAMILAR WITH IF YOU PLAN TO DEMAND THAT YOUR GOING TO PROVIDE HELP TO A CONSCIOUS BUT UNWILLING VICTIM. Implied consent, Expressed consent. and Assault.
The good sam as it applies to lay rescuers is made up of three sections. One you must only act in the best interest of the patient, two you can only act within you own scope of expertise, CPR, open airway whatever (no magyver stuff) and three is you choose to get involvd you must accompany that victim until they are turned over to someone with equal or greater training, otherwise you have abandoned them which is also a crime.
Getting back to what KWS said, I have one save in the water, and I will never assume anyone I see who needs help is dead, its completely irrelevent. The only thing that matters is your safety no matter what. Then we need to get them to the surface, everything else gets put on hold until then.
In survival medicine theres something called the rule of threes. 3 minutes w/o air, 3 hours w/o shelter days w/o water weeks w/o food and 3 months wihtout hope. the expectionto to that is drowning victims, chocking victims, fire/burns and dangerous situations. 80 fsw is both dangerous and drowning so you fix that first before moving to anything else.
also I would never risk the possibility of saving life for a crime scene or anything else except myself of my buddy/partner. Dont worry about it, uness its a hazard to you get them to the surface, dumb their lead inflate bc and if you cant do anything then don't. the worst thing you can do is nothing and the only thing you should try to do is leave theem doing better than how you found them. dead and not missing is better than dead and on the bottom of hte ocean.