• Welcome to ScubaBoard


  1. Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

    Benefits of registering include

    • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
    • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
    • You can make this box go away

    Joining is quick and easy. Login or Register now by clicking on the button

Serious question, Nitrox and extended erections

Discussion in 'Humor, Games, Clips, Yarns and Tales' started by SharPll, Jul 24, 2019.

  1. Sh0rtBus

    Sh0rtBus BUBBLLLLLLES! My Bubbles ScubaBoard Supporter

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Denton, TX
    736
    452
    63
    The thread definitely seems to be a bit flacid the last couple of days. Quick....take another hit of EAN32....should perk things right up!
     
  2. CT-Rich

    CT-Rich Solo Diver

    2,411
    2,235
    113
    Have you tried changing hands?:cheers:
     
    txgoose, Sh0rtBus and ibj40 like this.
  3. MEmersonC

    MEmersonC Angel Fish

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
    25
    24
    13
    Why would someone want to get rid of a built-in keel? All I see are positives. Keep that course steady! Maybe its just me:acclaim:
     
  4. Daebado

    Daebado Nassau Grouper

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Kansas
    85
    66
    18
    Oh, built-in keel! I read that as built in eel at first. Makes more sense, now!
    Although, the eel thing works, too! Of course, I suppose wildlife photographers would be trying to get photos of it if that were the case.
    Let's see.... macro or wide angle? :D
     
  5. MEmersonC

    MEmersonC Angel Fish

    # of Dives: 100 - 199
    Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
    25
    24
    13
    Just better keep that "eel" away from fire coral!
     

Share This Page