Funny you shold mention that because I think they realize when you make the players sign such agreements ,that can get very extensive, it is bad for PR. They make up for it in the design of things like mim and max bet limits to insure the house advantage. That house advantage more than adaquately covers the loss from card counters. The casino example that would apply here is to make a big win at an indian casino and they refuse to pay off because,,,,, they are indians and it is thier casino and they have ultimate authority to designate any machine as broke at any time, there for negating the jackpot winning. Now do they tell you that when you walk in. Heck no they dont. That would stop thier cash flow. "The withholding of such ilicit gambling payoff practices is the key to our occupation and ability to make a living" Anyone heard that before. The only difference in indian casinos and the sea captains assumed rights is that the casino does not have to transit through others area of authority. Untill the casino leaves The reservation its governance is by the indian nations and not the gaming commisions. And are generally protected from federal and local regulation. Vegas or Atlantic city could never get away with the antics the indian reservations are allowed to engage in. So yes they have the trump card when it comes to setting the rules. But imagine when the casino pushes thier ultimate authority to include nightly masacres at sunset on the prarrie patio. Someone woud suggest that things have gone too far. The casino will say you were told when you entered. and the customer says I thought it was an enactment not a real masacre. They will say you should have read the agreement more closely and thank you for your cash , now time for paleface to go home, good by.