As I understand it, someone help me out if Im wrong here, if you are perfectly weighted, and diving wet, your BC lift should be able to compensate for:
The swing weight of your tank(s), full versus empty.
The swing weight of you wet suit, surface (not compressed) versus compressed.
The negative buoyancy of a pony if you carry one.
Since you want to be neutrally buoyant at depth with a near empty tank after handing off the pony, you start negatively buoyant by an amount equal to the sing weight of the tank and wetsuit as well as the negative buoyancy of the pony. You need to have enough lift to compensate for that weight at depth (max wet suit compression) with a full tank and the pony still attached.
To be safe I would add some amount of margin to account for being over weighted.
The worst case is the largest capacity tank and the thickest wetsuit. For me that was a HP120, hooded semi-dry 7-8-6 wetsuit, and 30 cf pony. When I added it up 11, 8, and 5 respectively for 24#, I thought a 27# did not leave much room for margin so I went with the 36#.
The swing weight of your tank(s), full versus empty.
The swing weight of you wet suit, surface (not compressed) versus compressed.
The negative buoyancy of a pony if you carry one.
Since you want to be neutrally buoyant at depth with a near empty tank after handing off the pony, you start negatively buoyant by an amount equal to the sing weight of the tank and wetsuit as well as the negative buoyancy of the pony. You need to have enough lift to compensate for that weight at depth (max wet suit compression) with a full tank and the pony still attached.
To be safe I would add some amount of margin to account for being over weighted.
The worst case is the largest capacity tank and the thickest wetsuit. For me that was a HP120, hooded semi-dry 7-8-6 wetsuit, and 30 cf pony. When I added it up 11, 8, and 5 respectively for 24#, I thought a 27# did not leave much room for margin so I went with the 36#.