AfterDark
Contributor
Yes, in the past we have shared this concern.
The Navy Tables (like the DCIEM military tables) have always been specifically designed for Navy Divers; young men with an extreme level of physical fitness and able to pass a Navy Diving Medical. When I was at DCIEM, we wrote a separate set of Tables for Sport Diving which were more liberal.
The 2.2% figure pertains to qualified Navy Divers using the 60 FPM protocol at the limit of the tables, but marginally within them. My point was that it`s relatively easy to get bent by following the older tables that do not employ a slower ascent rate. In any regard, I think that it`s clear that you have a greater chance of DCS at 60 FPM than 30 FPM and above 30FSW your risk is decreased if you ascend at 10FPM.
Absolutely, when fitness is low or medical conditions are present, the individual must weigh the risk factors and accept them before the dive begins. That said, some people decide to accept dive plans that are not optimal. I`m aware that my risk increases if I`m diving in a cave, wreck, or on deep Heliox. Each of us must be directed by our physical and mental condition-attitude, level of confidence, training and experience. Afterall each of us are the ones that must accept or reject the risk and pay the piper if required.
IMO if the diver is at the extreme end of a bottom time then 60fpm ascent rate probably would increase the chances of DCS. I believe that was why it was stressed to us to never push the limits of the tables, always go to the next depth, time or group if you are close to the limit. Advice I followed for many years doing both air NDLs and deco dives using 60fpm on more than half of my 2032 dives without a hit. Moderation in diving profiles is no accident.