cummings66
Contributor
That's not a bad price for a SPG like that with hose. I've been looking for something to replace my Sherwood gage.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
cummings66:To me and I'll say it again, it's been posted a couple times. The main benefit is that it records my tank pressures for me allowing me to log them at a later date for air consumption analysis.
Soggy:Normally from me, but I'm waiting on an order to come in. If you can wait a month, I'll probably have them.
I agree with you on how it works. And you're right, faulty is probably a bad choice for a descriptive word. But the question was do I think it is "conservative" or "faulty?" Since the information provided in the air time remaining is not, at least in my humble opinion, remotely accurate, I would have to classify it as faulty and not conservative.SpiderSense:I don't think FAULTY is the right word here. the computer gives you measurements based on the data it has at the time. if things change, the info changes. it just gives an indication of what you have, not exact since it can't predict the future.
Tienuts:I guess what I failed to post, is that the change in the air time remaining should be relative to your depth. If I decend 3 feet to follow the contour of a reef or wreck, my VT pro will start howling at me, and the air time remaining graph will drop from 60 min to 5. Not accurate in my eyes.
Soggy:Snip.....................
Because you still need an SPG to go with it since the things are unreliable.
Matsya:TWhile I agree that 40 dives may not be statistically significant, I have read several posts from several members on this forum who have stated that they have used wireless AI for years without facing any reliability issues.