XZ-1 with WA110

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

chile7236

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Messages
1,329
Reaction score
119
severe vignetting at it's widest setting...although, i read that the lens didn't work with the XZ-1, i figured i'd try since i already have the lens...not sure how much zoom i did but it wasn't too much. definitely better FOV than w/out the WA110 at the same zoom.

sunabecarnationoverhangcopy.jpg


SunabeLion2copy.jpg


SUnabeLionfishcopy.jpg


SunabeLion3copy.jpg


SunabePeliculacopy.jpg


sunabewhipgobycopy.jpg


---------- Post added ----------

another lion fish shot but edited with aperture this time...

sunabelion3-6-3.jpg
 
Very nice. Where are theese shot?
Just got the UWL-H100 for my XZ-1. Looking forward to getting it wet.
 
definitely better FOV than w/out the WA110 at the same zoom.

This is very nice set up, Your images show how good it is.
I do not want to use zoom with wide lens. I prefer to cut images later, but one of my favorite images are close up wide angle.
393674_327031240658989_759418319_n.jpg
 
yeah, i don't like to zoom either but it turned out okay :wink:...nice pic.
 
Once I tested WA lens which was not dedicated to 24 mm camera. Then, the same like You, to avoid vignietting I have to use some zoom. After diving, when I take a look on images I say it was the last time with that type of testing :p
Almost all of them I have to cut to square ratio like this :( At that time I decided to use proper WA or macro :) :)
326457_337156749646438_100000563469734_1216914_1375759765_o.jpg
 

Back
Top Bottom