DevonDiver
N/A
@DevonDiver: You seem to be advocating that all stops (deco, mandatory safety, and optional safety) are mandatory. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Not at all. I'm probably not expressing myself well. A recreational diver has optional [Adjective: Available to be chosen but not obligatory] safety stops.
What I am trying to convey is that there may be cases where a recreational diver would be imprudent not to choose to complete one. Fast ascents and other predisposing DCS factors have a direct bearing on that prudence.
After an otherwise faultless dive, with little-no DSC predisposing factors/events, then it is a simple matter of conservatism to employ a safety stop.
After a bad dive, where DCS predisposing factors/events are present, then it goes beyond mere 'conservatism' and becomes a prudent proactive measure to help prevent DCS.
I guess you could call this the 'level of urgency' that the stop possesses - which is dictated by the dive events.
I've never been a fan of the term "mandatory safety stop." I believe PADI invented that term so that it wouldn't be making reference to deco stops on the PADI/DSAT RDP.
I don't agree. It isn't deco - there is no 'ceiling' produced by the table algorithm. However, it is sufficiently close to that 'grey area' that the importance of completing a stop becomes more critical. Therefore, PADI advise divers to always plan to conduct the stop under those circumstances. However, as it is not a algorithm-produced 'formal' stop, then it can be 'blown off' if other, more critical, factors/risks present themselves.
The key word being 'plan'. You always plan a 'mandatory safety stop'. You can opt to plan other safety stops, if you like.
You can abort any safety stop, if doing so is the lesser of two evils.
A deco stop proposes that you have an unhealthy risk of DCS if you abort/miss it.
A safety stop proposes that you have a healthy chance of avoiding DCS, whatever you do.
However, in physiological terms there is no strict line between deco and no-deco.
It isn't really "safer" to miss a safety stop when you have 1 min NDL remaining, than if you blow a deco stop one minute later.
Some divers 'ride the curve' by multi-leveling on ascent, whilst maintaining 1-2 minutes of NDL on their computers. Those same divers freak at the notion of going into deco. I mean... really??!!?
What I'm trying to illustrate is that it is equally senseless to apply that same line of thought in respect to safety stops.
Put simply, there are times when a diver should treat a safety stop with the same respect that they would treat a deco stop.