RICoder
Contributor
Oh man...I'm SCREWED! I bought my Cobra in 2000.
Other than sending it out for a checkup, I wouldn't worry too much.
Other than sending it out for a checkup, I wouldn't worry too much.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Thalassamania:Just make sure there's a user replaceable battery<G>.
OneBadBusa:I got an ORCA Phoenix, 2 dry suits, a wet suit, 4 aluminum 80's, 2 sets of regs, back pack, bag and 3 BC's had them all checked out and re hydro'd for under a $1000.
Not too bad I hope. You can be honest I can take it.
well, beside the questionable "luxury" of a instructors income, every single one of my computers is older than 5 yrs at this point. i dont see anything wrong with it. as for any other piece of equipment - service and maintanance rules apply!!!OneBadBusa:At the family cookout yesterday an instructor was invited. Of course I spent a lot of time asking lots of DFQ's. Told him about the unbelievable deal I got off EBay. He told me I shouldn't use a dive computer that's over 5 years old and he made a lot of sense as to why not. What do others feel about this? I don't have the luxury of his yearly income but I do also have a console without a computer in it.
Forgive my ignorance... but this is the FIRST I have heard of this. Which manufacturer(s) suggests this practice?LSDeep:that means basically, also your divecomputer may be (depending on the mfg) due every year or two for a checkup and "readjusting".
I'm pretty sure that recommendation is in the manual for my Oceanic Data Plus 2 computer, and I'll bet it's buried in the manual of a lot of others. Kind of a general escape of liability clause for the manufacturer if someone gets bent by a computer reading the wrong depth.NetDoc:Forgive my ignorance... but this is the FIRST I have heard of this. Which manufacturer(s) suggests this practice?
NetDoc:Forgive my ignorance... but this is the FIRST I have heard of this. Which manufacturer(s) suggests this practice?