When I was ready to get dive insurance (about 6 months ago), the DAN controversy was a big consideration, in addition to the story about the head of DAN lining his pockets with company monies. Consequently, I chose V&B, because DiveAssure didn't write policies in my state. Dive Assure actually looked like the best policy, but life goes on.
I won't go into the saga, but V&B showed me that there are actually human beings on the other side of the phone line. They don't know it, but they impressed the hell out of me.
Not that I want to disract anyone from their DAN bashing and/or love affair, but is there anything wrong with the insurance from V&B? What makes DAN insurance better/worse? V&B may be linked to PADI, but the cost of the policy is in line with the others.
As far as primary coverage is concerned, I believe (not 100% sure on this one) that some HMO's won't cover, or will give limited coverage to, people engaged in "extreme" sports. Might be worth your while to check to see if your primary considers dive accidents as part of your coverage. Weigh that against the policy coverages from the dive insurance companies.
I won't go into the saga, but V&B showed me that there are actually human beings on the other side of the phone line. They don't know it, but they impressed the hell out of me.
Not that I want to disract anyone from their DAN bashing and/or love affair, but is there anything wrong with the insurance from V&B? What makes DAN insurance better/worse? V&B may be linked to PADI, but the cost of the policy is in line with the others.
As far as primary coverage is concerned, I believe (not 100% sure on this one) that some HMO's won't cover, or will give limited coverage to, people engaged in "extreme" sports. Might be worth your while to check to see if your primary considers dive accidents as part of your coverage. Weigh that against the policy coverages from the dive insurance companies.