wolf eel
Contributor
I agree. That is an excellent idea. That would wead out the useless instructors also.
Very good idea.
Very good idea.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
in_cavediver:2) Some divers were commenting about how to rate divers on a charter and what can
be done for screening. This is what the whole certification idea was to solve. If it's
broke, and trust me, it is, then why wouldn't you simply try to fix it instead of all
of the eloborate new stuff.
The fact is divers don't learn what they need to know and there is nothing being done to correct it. Actually, more is being done to perpetuate the problem. I have had several instructors and some were highly competent and thorough and some were an embarrassment. This is at all levels not just OW.
They can ask for a log book.wedivebc:The dive operator only has a little plastic card to assess their ability to do the dive.
The charter operator could say, "I see your log book shows 100 dives, but they're all 30 ft quarry dives. I'm sorry, but I don't think that's adequate for this 100 ft dive in 30 deg water with a 2 knot current so I'm not going to let you sign up. Sorry."wedivebc:There needs to be a better way to determine if a person is prepared to dive in a given environment.
I have a NAUI OW card. According to NAUI, I'm "considered competent to engage in open water diving activities without supervision, provided the diving activities and the areas dived approximate those of training."wedivebc:It is not a fault of the training system if someone has no experience in more extreme environments it is a fault of the certifying system.
No....Its the fault of the diver.wedivebc:It is not a fault of the training system if someone has no experience in more extreme environments it is a fault of the certifying system.
Absolutely! The problem is in this day and age, no one sues themselves when they screw up.JeffG:No....Its the fault of the diver.
wedivebc:Absolutely! The problem is in this day and age, no one sues themselves when they screw up.
But unfortunately the ideas that have been floated in this thread, they believe the "solution" is to create another level of "certification" above and beyond what exists to protect divers from themselves.SteveDiver:I agree! They attempt to blame someone else for their ignorance. HMMM. lets see- I will put this HOT cup of coffee in my crotch while driving, I will burn my balls and sue McDonald's makes sense? yea great idea!... lol
And your solution is to let Darwin sort it out. You can't really believe that the feds won't step in if the accident rates increase. In the real world finding a way to keep divers from killing themselves is a more workable solution than letting the bad divers just kill themselves off.JeffG:But unfortunately the ideas that have been floated in this thread, they believe the "solution" is to create another level of "certification" above and beyond what exists to protect divers from themselves.