1. My point here was not one of safey (doubles vs single/bailout) but of better gas utilization. ( I can usually get three recreational dives out of my 72s.)Spectre once bubbled...
1.I'm still looking for a compelling argument on how the second dive on a set of doubles is safer than a dive with a single and a bailout.
In my eyes, the inconvenience of swapping a tank out between dives is miniscule compared to the added complexity of doubles. 2.Complexity in that you can't 'plan' to have enough gas in reserve, as the 'reserve' is completely dependant on how fast you get the sucker isolated. 3.Also, for nasty access shore diving, I much prefer to be able to bring the tank down in the first trip, the pony in the second... rather than huffing a set of doubles. [/B]
2. What type of failure are you expecting will drain the reserve away before you can isolate? Actually it is very easy for me to manipulate the valves on my manifold. From my perspective the doubles rig is much more flexible than a single w/bailout since both tanks are available to either reg. and yet can be quickly isolated.
3. Yes, I can see situations where in the absence of a sherpa it would be easier to handle two singles than one set of doubles... though I don't think the exception proves the case. BTW... is a redundant tank/reg really necessary for these nasty access shore dives you are doing or is it just a perceived need.