NetDoc:
Actually, I am advocating an increase in instruction, not less. I also advocate teaching what the student will be using. If the student doesn't use it (ie tables) then we have no reason to teach it. I am not sure why you are so against the teaching of computers in a class room situation. Especially considering your user name.
You did READ my post, right? One part you didn't quote was "If Sport Chalet decided to teach actual hands-on computer usage, that would be another thing." But they're not. They are substituting an easily-broken crappy plastic calculator instead of tables.
NetDoc:
Yes, yes, let's break out those nifty BCs with the CO2! Let's show them how to operate that J-Valve! All in the interest of driving students away with archaic BS that they really don't need to learn.
It's best if you take a statement to the absurd degree, is that the idea? I never advocated CO2 or J-Valves, I advocated tables, which I still feel have a place in instruction... and others clearly do, too.
More importantly, the thrust to my post which seems to have been missed, is that while
I AGREE that computers are the future, I DISAGREE that tables are irrelevant, and apparently PADI and Sport Chalet do, too, since they
still are not teaching computers. They have merely substituted teaching hardy tables for cheaply made (yet more expensive) calculators that break if you step on them or mistreat them in any way, unlike the vast majority of dive gear.
They are still teaching tables, in a sense, they have just changed the hardware for the worse.