DevonDiver
N/A
There's one universal truism when it comes to diving courses: You get what you pay for.
Offering a cheap(er) course generally means that it has to be:
1) Loaded with students: (max student/instructor ratio is 8:1 and more with a DM assistant). The higher ratios dilutes practice time and obstructs the instructor from paying sufficient personal attention to refining and/or remediating each students' development.
2) Minimum Timescale: The instructor manual for the Open Water course lists the minimum requirements for training. Somehow, for many dive centers/instructors, those minimum requirements have become the course. Nothing more. Those requirements can be squeezed into an absurdly short space of time. There is no adjustment to those minimums or that time-scale based upon other factors; such as the student's actual ability, the student-instructor ratio or the diving conditions.
3) Minimum Standards: The courses have to run to a fast schedule. Delays and extensions erase profitability. This means that the instructor is under pressure to squeeze each and every student through the course, irregardless of their actual progression and ability. Needless to say, not every student has the capacity to reach a good standard of diving competency within a minimum timescale (some do, but few). The instructor, therefore, feels obliged to lower their definition of 'mastery'; to lower the 'pass' standards.
4) Cheap Instructor: Instructor wages form a substantial portion of the dive course costs. Course costs can be decreased by reducing this cost. Inexperienced (newly qualified) or low standard instructors are often willing to work for peanuts (or free)... "for the experience". Some dive centers capitalize on this - selecting only staff who have extremely low expectations of payment. In contrast, experienced and dedicated instructors; who have accumulated a wealth of diving and teaching experience, tend to want a salary commensurate with their ability. As the saying goes; "you pay peanuts, you get monkeys". Such instructors have a low breadth of experience (less able to recognize and correct student weaknesses), often with a low motivation to achieve high-quality results. These instructors are caught in the same 'trap' as the dive center - typically paid per student/per course, they need to achieve volume training. They are not rewarded for quality. No prizes for guessing their mindset when teaching...
Offering a cheap(er) course generally means that it has to be:
1) Loaded with students: (max student/instructor ratio is 8:1 and more with a DM assistant). The higher ratios dilutes practice time and obstructs the instructor from paying sufficient personal attention to refining and/or remediating each students' development.
2) Minimum Timescale: The instructor manual for the Open Water course lists the minimum requirements for training. Somehow, for many dive centers/instructors, those minimum requirements have become the course. Nothing more. Those requirements can be squeezed into an absurdly short space of time. There is no adjustment to those minimums or that time-scale based upon other factors; such as the student's actual ability, the student-instructor ratio or the diving conditions.
3) Minimum Standards: The courses have to run to a fast schedule. Delays and extensions erase profitability. This means that the instructor is under pressure to squeeze each and every student through the course, irregardless of their actual progression and ability. Needless to say, not every student has the capacity to reach a good standard of diving competency within a minimum timescale (some do, but few). The instructor, therefore, feels obliged to lower their definition of 'mastery'; to lower the 'pass' standards.
4) Cheap Instructor: Instructor wages form a substantial portion of the dive course costs. Course costs can be decreased by reducing this cost. Inexperienced (newly qualified) or low standard instructors are often willing to work for peanuts (or free)... "for the experience". Some dive centers capitalize on this - selecting only staff who have extremely low expectations of payment. In contrast, experienced and dedicated instructors; who have accumulated a wealth of diving and teaching experience, tend to want a salary commensurate with their ability. As the saying goes; "you pay peanuts, you get monkeys". Such instructors have a low breadth of experience (less able to recognize and correct student weaknesses), often with a low motivation to achieve high-quality results. These instructors are caught in the same 'trap' as the dive center - typically paid per student/per course, they need to achieve volume training. They are not rewarded for quality. No prizes for guessing their mindset when teaching...