You know, I think a lot of people on this board would agree (myself included) that OW certification ought to be longer, more rigorous, and more inclusive than it is. If one had enough opportunity to dive in open water WITHOUT anything going wrong, one could have enough confidence to cope with emergency drills. For me, four open water dives of minimum length were enough to convince me that it was possible to survive underwater if all other things were favorable, but far from enough to make me blithely confident of handling all misadventures under water. I would be VERY surprised if most OW cert people are really ready to handle anything that can go wrong when they are diving.
I got enough excitement out of buddy separation in poor viz on my third OW cert dive . . . proceeding to the surface all alone, which I did quite competently and without mishap, and without shaking my confidence (much) since I had a protocol for how to proceed. But I had my regulator, and I had air (lots of it) and all I had to do was keep my wits about me and proceed to the surface, which I did.
I think for most of us, fear comes from losing our air source, whether that be from an OOA situation, losing the regulator, equipment malfunction, or whatever. Drills that involve depriving a student of air should, in my opinion (for what it's worth) wait until someone's ability to function under NORMAL circumstances under water are pretty decent. The key to building coping skills is to stress the student, but not to the point of dysfunction. You can reduce stress by explaining what the drill will be before it occurs, or by confining the drills to things the student is almost certain to be able to handle. Throwing things at the student that are not rehearsed in advance, or are pushing the edge of the envelope, result in unpredictable consequences.
When I was learning to drive (had my learner's permit), my father reached his foot over one day and stomped on the accelerator and said, "Your throttle's stuck." I was on an offramp, facing a pretty good curve, and I knew the most important thing was to reduce velocity. So I disengaged the clutch. It was a GOOD answer -- it solved the immediate problem, which was to reduce our speed. It was a BAD answer because it could have destroyed the engine. Of course, in a real stuck throttle emergency, that would have been fine, because the imperative was safety. We had never rehearsed this emergency, and I was not told to expect the drill. The lesson? If you are going to practice emergency procedures, make sure they have been rehearsed, and preferably, warn the student that a drill may be in the offing. That substantially raises one's chances of getting an adaptive response from the student, and a solid learning experience.
I got enough excitement out of buddy separation in poor viz on my third OW cert dive . . . proceeding to the surface all alone, which I did quite competently and without mishap, and without shaking my confidence (much) since I had a protocol for how to proceed. But I had my regulator, and I had air (lots of it) and all I had to do was keep my wits about me and proceed to the surface, which I did.
I think for most of us, fear comes from losing our air source, whether that be from an OOA situation, losing the regulator, equipment malfunction, or whatever. Drills that involve depriving a student of air should, in my opinion (for what it's worth) wait until someone's ability to function under NORMAL circumstances under water are pretty decent. The key to building coping skills is to stress the student, but not to the point of dysfunction. You can reduce stress by explaining what the drill will be before it occurs, or by confining the drills to things the student is almost certain to be able to handle. Throwing things at the student that are not rehearsed in advance, or are pushing the edge of the envelope, result in unpredictable consequences.
When I was learning to drive (had my learner's permit), my father reached his foot over one day and stomped on the accelerator and said, "Your throttle's stuck." I was on an offramp, facing a pretty good curve, and I knew the most important thing was to reduce velocity. So I disengaged the clutch. It was a GOOD answer -- it solved the immediate problem, which was to reduce our speed. It was a BAD answer because it could have destroyed the engine. Of course, in a real stuck throttle emergency, that would have been fine, because the imperative was safety. We had never rehearsed this emergency, and I was not told to expect the drill. The lesson? If you are going to practice emergency procedures, make sure they have been rehearsed, and preferably, warn the student that a drill may be in the offing. That substantially raises one's chances of getting an adaptive response from the student, and a solid learning experience.